@Riedl @Npars01

#AI audits remain a conceptual and nebulous process at best... so does indemnification (especially for physician & institutional use of #Health & #Healthcare #AI’s)

• #data provenance
• data governance
• algorithmic accountability
…all require regulatory frameworks.

In the mean time:
#AI remains a savage and lawless land.

The #SenateAIHearing today was basically techno-political theatre – the appearance of ‘doing something’

#EthicalAI
#AIEthics
#ArtificialIntelligence

And that's the #SenateAIHearing closed. If I needed motivation to work on the edits to my piece about GPT, this was it.

Again, the thread broke when I tried to edit a toot, in there, so here's part 1: https://ourislandgeorgia.net/@Wolven/110378922091969254
and part 2: https://ourislandgeorgia.net/@Wolven/110379107564377616

Booker showing his technocratic roots, even while urging caution; asking what we can do about the idea that a very few corps will control the field; Marcus talking about the problems of BingChat and how those made a space for others to be AS LOOSE with ethics, goes on to talk about personal shift from technical discussions to policy.

Booker asks Altman about concerns over how market forces and impacts will move toward reg. capture; Altman discusses "why we started as open source" [neatly skipping the part about why they closed]. #SenateAIHearing