I am reviewing processes and recommendations for #SecondaryData analysis projects for our #ResearchEthics Committee, especially ones where data access is centrally managed (e.g., via @UKDataService ). Here, they require standard review.

How is this at your place?

Any views on this?

### ###

NB: Yes, there are many ethical considerations in advance (e.g.,
https://mastodon.social/deck/@jrboehnke/109823124976479472
and for #RoutineData
https://mastodon.social/deck/@jrboehnke/113940722709618338).
My question is about applying for ethics review for such a project.

Just registered for the #NCRM webinar "Exploring #Ethnicity through National Datasets"
https://events.teams.microsoft.com/event/f1f91205-7d44-4add-871d-8f4f894a271e@c152cb07-614e-4abb-818a-f035cfa91a77

The line up of talks looks great, covering how ethnicity was/is covered in the #Census, as well as researching identity, aspiration, social mobility, and the justice system.

#Surveys #SecondaryData

Read from #DundeeUni colleague Louise Marryat and colleagues about the power of public involvement in data research:
"We are privileged to have a huge amount of data available to research: using it in an inclusive way is not only ethical but also leads to more valuable impacts."

https://www.britishscienceassociation.org/essay-12-dundee-voices-in-data

#SecondaryData #DundeeUni

So glad that this was a recorded opportunity, so I am very much looking forward to watching this!

More info on topics and speakers:
https://www.pathlms.com/isoqol/webinars/32102

#HRQL #SecondaryData #ClinicalRegistries
@ISOQOL