requeteChe wrote:

.. some kind of independent lossless pseudonym ONG ..
..
In any case, ultimately even an issue that in part ends up in conversations and best practice about trust and creating a #webOfTrust between those involved in a mandatory and by default pseudonym environment ..
Ultimately this is a crucial point that needs to be worked out very well as the internet itself, scamming on one hand and at the same time on the other hand real people and their data and safety, are issues that can't be underestimated.


Examples:
"Die Tinder-Schwindler: Der Riesenbetrug mit der Liebe | SPIEGEL TV":
A spiegelTV documentary on YT about scams on the web. Not only a blueprint for scamers but an interesting take that shows a lot of angles and the damage all this implies.
"Gewalt gegen (kolumbianische) Aktivisten":
A #TAZ article by @tazgetroete about the exposure of environmental activists in particular in #latinAmerica:

TAZ translated wrote:

Bangkok afp | According to a report, almost 200 environmental activists were murdered worldwide last year. According to the non-governmental organization Global Witness on Tuesday, Latin America remains the most dangerous region for people working to protect the environment and respect land rights.

So, while in general terms we do have all the tools at hand, including even options like some kind of escrow guarantees for monetary aspects and things like #SEGWIT ID profiles @bc1q3jmgjcvmd5eaadx69ggazctksr0d7ca4q6w4vr and even simple ID verification's via payPal for example, first of all this has to do with the interest of people to involve themselves in working out some how some kind of:

  • proof of concepts
  • proof of work
  • proof of stake
  • proof of cooperation


#altText:
Some video snippets of the #spiegelTV documentation about internet scams. The subtitels are in englisch, The people interviewed are seen in their environment.

@mina @aiquez @sinmisterios @crossgolf_rebel @resl @dprieto