@PDFlynn
Partisan gerrymandering is a direct assault on the very basis of democracy (that the people decide, not a tyrant or oligarchy).

It is a stunning affront to reason and Justice that the #SCOTUS believe it is constitutional.
#SCOTUSEthicsNow

Why Alito’s 'stop the steal' flag story just fell apart

Alternet.org

@[email protected]
"Avoiding an appearance of impropriety" means recusing if your wife is an active supporter of one side in. acase before the court.

Why don't Alito and Thomas seem to understand that
#SCOTUSEthicsNow

Race aside, there is something very wrong that the SCOTUS accepts that partisan gerrymandering is constitutional.

The mere notion that parties can choose their voters to maximize power is deeply undemocratic.
#SCOTUSEthicsNow

Justices Poised to Restore Voting Map Ruled a Racial Gerrymander https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/11/us/politics/supreme-court-south-carolina-voting-map.html

Justices Poised to Restore Voting Map Ruled a Racial Gerrymander

The case concerned a constitutional puzzle: how to distinguish the roles of race and partisanship in drawing voting maps when Black voters overwhelmingly favor Democrats.

The New York Times

@joanmccarter
FFS, "politicizing" the SCOTUS has already happened.

I love Biden, but this is the worst excuse possible for inaction on this illegitimate SCOTUS.
#InvestigateSCOTUSNow
#SCOTUSEthicsNow

@GottaLaff
This guy "writes with a bullhorn"?
Who could have foreseen that?
#SCOTUSEthicsNow

No more pretending this is reasonable.
#SCOTUSEthicsNow

Questioned about a fishing trip hosted by GOP billionaire, Justice Alito replied in a rival news outlet

https://www.washingtonpost.com/media/2023/06/21/alito-wsj-propublica-fishing-trip/

ProPublica asked about Alito’s travel. He replied in the Wall Street Journal.

Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. was asked about a fishing trip with billionaire Paul Singer. He responded in the Journal before ProPublica could publish its scoop.

The Washington Post