“The history of work and jobs is littered with disruption, change, and we live today as much with the relics of old ways of working as we do the moulds of new forms we are creating,” argues Julia Hobsbawm. | https://bit.ly/4mfL6To
“The history of work and jobs is littered with disruption, change, and we live today as much with the relics of old ways of working as we do the moulds of new forms we are creating,” argues Julia Hobsbawm. | https://bit.ly/4mfL6To
“The history of work and jobs is littered with disruption, change, and we live today as much with the relics of old ways of working as we do the moulds of new forms we are creating,” argues Julia Hobsbawm. | https://bit.ly/4mfL6To
“The history of work and jobs is littered with disruption, change, and we live today as much with the relics of old ways of working as we do the moulds of new forms we are creating,” argues Julia Hobsbawm. | https://bit.ly/4mfL6To
"""
Oohhh... You thought the test was to see if the /machine/ was intelligent....
Whelp
"""
--- Turing, suddenly from the Midwest, signalling his departure as the conversation had turned rather uncomfortable when the full implications of his test settled in
===
"""
What did I miss?
"""
--- you, the reader, standing in for the gap
===
"""
The medium is the message
"""
--- a Canadian tradition, and one of the occult
===
What does it say of our own conversations that we consider a chatbot intelligent?
Polly want a token
===
[ ] Like [ ] Share [ ] Consciousness by Chalmers
( ) I can tell (x) I cannot
"""
Hey, I thought I called dubs on the bad thought experiments
"""
--- Chalmers, as to his zombie who was seemingly nonplussed by the interaction, his poker face counted amongst his stronger assets
===
"""
Men, always stealing out ideas and getting them wrong
"""
--- one of the Mary's, reflecting on her own treatise on men and their need to inject life where it's not wanted and doesn't belong
===
"""
"""
--- the zombie and the monster, reflecting or passing gas. Chalmers could never tell, given the constraints of his own experiment
Happy 🥧 day
"""
Where Gleason requires interlocking constraints from three or more orthogonal directions at a single depth, this proof generates an infinite tower of consistency conditions across depths. The same correlation function must satisfy the composition rule at every scale simultaneously. "Enough dimensions" is replaced by "enough scales." Depth does the constraining work that width cannot.
"""
--- an interesting thing to have found, on the day of pie, a chain pinned at both ends
===
"""
Draw a distinction and a universe comes into being
"""
--- Spencer Brown, Laws of Form