Hugo van KemenadeNew drafts open for discussion:
#PEP771 proposes default extras for packages: to allow default deps to be installed by default, but advanced users could do a minimal install
https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-771-default-extras-for-python-software-packages/79706
#PEP772 proposes a packaging governance process
https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-772-packaging-governance-process/79724
Submitted for pronouncement:
#PEP750 proposes template strings
https://github.com/python/steering-council/issues/275
#PEP770 aims to make it easy for maintainers to embed SBOMs in wheels
PEP 771: Default Extras for Python Software Packages
Hi everyone, Along with @jonathandekhtiar we have written PEP 771: Default Extras for Python Software Packages which is now published as a draft! Short summary For anyone who hasn’t seen a previous version of this PEP, in short the aim of this PEP is to propose a way for Python packages to define one or more extras that get installed by default if no extras are explicitly specified. The two main cases this aims to solve are: packages that have recommended but not required dependencies that ...