Legal AI promises to streamline research, but does it deliver?
A new Stanford study found leading tools still hallucinate in 1 out of 6 queries - even top firms struggle to measure their real efficiency gains.
Will AI's accuracy and transparency hurdles hold back its transformative potential in law?
Read more:
https://hai.stanford.edu/news/ai-trial-legal-models-hallucinate-1-out-6-or-more-benchmarking-queries
The tone shift from #FutureLaw when we went from the conversation about AI to the conversation about blockchain could not have been more jarring, unpleasant, and out of place.
Utter hogwash.
This is super cool. I feel like maybe it's a little limited, in that you want to be able to test reasoning, not only answers. I'm not sure how to build a task description that requires the LLM to have given the right answer for the right reason or reasons. But it's a step in the right direction, for sure.
I'd consider going to this #Futurelaw event at Stanford ... but I don't want to become the target of attacks by federal judges, a major university, and congress people for disagreeing with a Federalist.
We’re back to continue the season for 2023! Every now and then we a broader view of the future of law, beyond ALSPs, and in this episode we do just that. Mike Madison chats with Eric Holder, former Attorney General of the US under President Barack Obama, about the critical importance of defending and advancing voting rights in the American system and in democracy generally. The conversation draws on his recent book, "Our Unfinished March." What are your thoughts? Make sure you tune in every Tuesday for everything legaltech, ALSP’s and law. Head to www.thefuturelawpodcast.com for more information. Thanks for listening! CREDITS: Book: ‘Our Unfinished March’ by Eric Holder and Sam Koppelman Hosts: Mike Madison and Dan Hunter Executive Producer/Editor: Pariya Taherzadeh