Logic Syllabus • Discussion 1
https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2023/06/02/logic-syllabus-discussion-1/

Re: Logic Syllabus ( https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/logic-syllabus/ )
Re: Laws of Form ( https://groups.io/g/lawsofform/topic/logic_syllabus/99218507 )
Re: John Mingers ( https://groups.io/g/lawsofform/message/2326 )

JM: ❝In a previous post you mentioned the minimal negation operator. Is there also the converse of this, i.e. an operator which is true when exactly one of its arguments is true? Or is this just XOR?❞

Yes, the “just one true” operator is a very handy tool. We discussed it earlier under the headings of “genus and species relations” or “radio button logic”. Viewed in the form of a venn diagram it describes a partition of the universe of discourse into mutually exclusive and exhaustive regions.

Reading \(\texttt{(} x_1 \texttt{,} \ldots \texttt{,} x_m \texttt{)}\) to mean just one of \(x_1, \ldots, x_m\) is false, the form \(\texttt{((} x_1 \texttt{),} \ldots \texttt{,(} x_m \texttt{))}\) means just one of \(x_1, \ldots, x_m\) is true.

For two logical variables, though, the cases “condense” or “degenerate” and saying “just one true” is the same thing as saying “just one false”.

\[\texttt{((} x_1 \texttt{),(} x_2 \texttt{))} = \texttt{(} x_1 \texttt{,} x_2 \texttt{)} = x_1 + x_2 = \mathrm{xor} (x_1, x_2).\]

There's more information on the following pages.

Minimal Negation Operators
https://oeis.org/wiki/Minimal_negation_operator

Related Truth Tables
https://oeis.org/wiki/Minimal_negation_operator#Truth_tables

Genus, Species, Pie Charts, Radio Buttons
https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2021/11/10/genus-species-pie-charts-radio-buttons-1/

Related Discussions
https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/?s=Radio+Buttons

#Logic #LogicSyllabus #BooleanDomain #BooleanFunction #BooleanValuedFunction
#Peirce #LogicalGraph #MinimalNegationOperator #ExclusiveDisjunction #XOR
#CactusLanguage #PropositionalCalculus #RadioButtonLogic #TruthTable

Logic Syllabus • Discussion 1

Re: Logic Syllabus Re: Laws of Form • John Mingers JM: In a previous post you mentioned the minimal negation operator.  Is there also the converse of this, i.e. an operator which is true …

Inquiry Into Inquiry
Logic Syllabus

This page serves as a focal node for a collection of related resources. Logical Operators Exclusive Disjunction Logical Implication Logical Conjunction Logical NAND Logical Disjunction Logical NNOR…

Inquiry Into Inquiry
Logic Syllabus

This page serves as a focal node for a collection of related resources. Logical Operators Exclusive Disjunction Logical Implication Logical Conjunction Logical NAND Logical Disjunction Logical NNOR…

Inquiry Into Inquiry

#DifferentialPropositionalCalculus • 2.5
https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2020/02/22/differential-propositional-calculus-2/

A plus sign \(+\) may be used for #ExclusiveDisjunction, allowing the following equivalents.

\[\begin{matrix} x + y ~=~ \texttt{(} x \texttt{,} y \texttt{)} \\[6pt] x + y + z ~=~ \texttt{((} x \texttt{,} y \texttt{),} z \texttt{)} ~=~ \texttt{(} x \texttt{,(} y \texttt{,} z \texttt{))} \end{matrix}\]

But note the last expressions are not equivalent to the triple bracket \(\texttt{(} x \texttt{,} y \texttt{,} z \texttt{)}.\)

Differential Propositional Calculus • 2

Inquiry Into Inquiry