https://lawalpine.com/blog/principles-of-evidence-law-nepal

Alpine Law Associates - Principles of Evidence Law in Nepal

Evidence law is the foundation of fair judicial proceedings, ensuring that courts make decisions based on reliable and relevant facts. In Nepal, the principles of evidence law—such as relevancy, the best evidence rule, the rule against hearsay, the burden of proof, and estoppel—guide how evidence is presented, admitted, and evaluated.

#EvidenceLaw #NepalLaw #JudicialProcess #CivilCode #EvidenceAct

Key Principles of Evidence Law in Nepal Explained

Learn the five fundamental principles of evidence law in Nepal, including relevancy, best evidence rule, hearsay, burden of proof, and estoppel.

Alpine Law Associates

https://lawalpine.com/blog/evidence-law-nepal

Alpine Law Associates - Evidence Law in Nepal

Evidence is the foundation of justice, serving as the means to prove or disprove disputed facts in court. Under Nepal’s Evidence Act, different types of evidence — primary, secondary, documentary, physical, and oral — play distinct roles in determining truth and fairness. Primary evidence, like original documents.
#EvidenceLaw #NepalLaw #JusticeSystem #LegalAwareness #CivilCodeNepal #CourtProceedings #LegalProcess

Evidence in Nepali Law: Types and Legal Significance

Understand the meaning, kinds, and legal value of evidence in Nepal. Learn how courts classify and admit evidence in civil and criminal cases.

Alpine Law Associates

'The Role and Position of AI Evidence in Civil Litigation' - an article published in 𝘔𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘤𝘪𝘯𝘦, 𝘓𝘢𝘸 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘚𝘰𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘵𝘺 on #ScienceOpen -

From University of Maribor Press:
🔗 https://www.scienceopen.com/document?vid=1e7c6cd6-3e01-4b04-999e-e4b91d710877

#AIEvidence #EvidenceLaw #CivilLitigation #AIandLaw #LegalTech

The Role and Position of AI Evidence in Civil Litigation

<p xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" class="first" dir="auto" id="d11329083e57"> This article examines the role and position of AI evidence in civil litigation. Despite the sporadic appearance of such evidence in court proceedings, it has the potential to revolutionize the evidential field and change our understanding of the nature and evidential qualities of existing types of evidence. After a thorough examination of the key technical specifications of AI, different classifications of AI evidence and various approaches to treatment of AI evidence, the author suggests how AI evidence should be treated according to the Slovenian Civil Procedure law. It is inferred that standard evidence rules can be applied to AI evidence, if the probative value of such evidence does not depend on the AI involved. In cases where probative value of evidence depends on the involved AI system, AI evidence can nevertheless be treated as witness or expert evidence, or, precisely, as ex parte affidavit or private expert opinion depending on the level of human or AI contribution to the content of AI evidence. The author concludes that black box and bias problems of AI systems generating evidence have to be properly addressed in order for AI evidence to achieve full evidential value and reliability. </p>

ScienceOpen
Surviving Roommate in Idaho Murders Asks Not to Testify in Bryan Kohberger's Trial

Bethany Funke, one of two surviving housemates in the University of Idaho quadruple homicide, has rejected a request to appear at the upcoming proceedings.

Jezebel