So it looks like this one was *not* filed under seal. And it only names one defendant, so I wouldn't call it a Schedule A case. But it's definitely against an online seller. And it's got #CounterfeitRhetoric.
The new DNJ standing order starts with some language that seems to be influenced by the #CounterfeitRhetoric we've seen in this space: www.njd.uscourts.gov/sites/njd/fi... Reminder: Not all #ScheduleA cases involve actual (or even alleged) counterfeiting: harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-13...
The brief leans heavily on the idea that there are "unique circumstances and problems caused by offshore, Internet-based counterfeiters." Of course, not all #ScheduleA cases are counterfeiting cases. #CounterfeitRhetoric
Another example of the pervasiveness of #CounterfeitRhetoric?
Judge Gottschall (NDIL) has changed the title of her #ScheduleA standing order to add the phrase "counterfeit product." Old: www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/_assets/_doc... New: www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/_assets/_doc... (h/t @ericgoldman.bsky.social) #CounterfeitRhetoric
For a longer explanation (and why this kind of #CounterfeitRhetoric is a problem), see: harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-13...

The Counterfeit Sham - Harvard...
Bluesky

Bluesky Social
The Counterfeit Sham - Harvard Law Review

Abstract There’s a new front in the IP rhetoric wars. Plaintiffs in “Schedule A” cases tell judges that they need to secretly seize the...

Harvard Law Review
The Counterfeit Sham

There’s a new front in the IP rhetoric wars. Plaintiffs in “Schedule A” cases tell judges that they need to secretly seize the assets of hundreds of defendants

Looking forward to presenting my forthcoming article, "The Counterfeit Sham" at #IPSC2024 today.

Draft available here: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4549909

And I guess now is as good a time as any to share: I'm rebranding!

I'll be publishing this article as "Sarah Fackrell" (FACK-rull).

The best is yet to come.

#DesignPatents #CounterfeitRhetoric #LawFedi

The Counterfeit Sham

There’s a new front in the IP rhetoric wars. Plaintiffs in “Schedule A” cases tell judges that they need to secretly seize the assets of hundreds of defendants

Counterfeit rhetoric, utility patent personal jurisdiction edition:

https://patentlyo.com/patent/2024/07/jurisdiction-undermines-counterfeiting.html

(For more on why patent infringement is not the same as counterfeiting, see https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4549909)

#PatentFedi #CounterfeitRhetoric

Lovevery Argues that APEX Jurisdiction Holding Undermines Anti-Counterfeiting Efforts

by Dennis Crouch This is my third post about SnapPower (SnapRays) v. Lighting Defense, and the Federal Circuit's holding that …

Patently-O