Oh and here we go with the #CounterfeitRhetoric:
Chalk this one up as another example of #CounterfeitRhetoric.

The Counterfeit Sham
The Counterfeit Sham

There’s a new front in the IP rhetoric wars. Plaintiffs in “Schedule A” cases tell judges that they need to secretly seize the assets of hundreds of defendants

So it looks like this one was *not* filed under seal. And it only names one defendant, so I wouldn't call it a Schedule A case. But it's definitely against an online seller. And it's got #CounterfeitRhetoric.
The new DNJ standing order starts with some language that seems to be influenced by the #CounterfeitRhetoric we've seen in this space: www.njd.uscourts.gov/sites/njd/fi... Reminder: Not all #ScheduleA cases involve actual (or even alleged) counterfeiting: harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-13...
The brief leans heavily on the idea that there are "unique circumstances and problems caused by offshore, Internet-based counterfeiters." Of course, not all #ScheduleA cases are counterfeiting cases. #CounterfeitRhetoric
Another example of the pervasiveness of #CounterfeitRhetoric?
Judge Gottschall (NDIL) has changed the title of her #ScheduleA standing order to add the phrase "counterfeit product." Old: www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/_assets/_doc... New: www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/_assets/_doc... (h/t @ericgoldman.bsky.social) #CounterfeitRhetoric
For a longer explanation (and why this kind of #CounterfeitRhetoric is a problem), see: harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-13...

The Counterfeit Sham - Harvard...
Bluesky

Bluesky Social
The Counterfeit Sham - Harvard Law Review

Abstract There’s a new front in the IP rhetoric wars. Plaintiffs in “Schedule A” cases tell judges that they need to secretly seize the...

Harvard Law Review
The Counterfeit Sham

There’s a new front in the IP rhetoric wars. Plaintiffs in “Schedule A” cases tell judges that they need to secretly seize the assets of hundreds of defendants