📄 Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters

Quicklook:
Planck Collaboration et al. (2014) · Astronomy and Astrophysics
Reads: 1097 · Citations: 8359
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321591

🔗 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...571A..16P/abstract

#Astronomy #Astrophysics #Cosmology #CosmicBackgroundRadiation #CosmologicalParameters

Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters

This paper presents the first cosmological results based on Planck measurements of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature and lensing-potential power spectra. We find that the Planck spectra at high multipoles (ℓ ≳ 40) are extremely well described by the standard spatially-flat six-parameter ΛCDM cosmology with a power-law spectrum of adiabatic scalar perturbations. Within the context of this cosmology, the Planck data determine the cosmological parameters to high precision: the angular size of the sound horizon at recombination, the physical densities of baryons and cold dark matter, and the scalar spectral index are estimated to be θ<SUB>∗</SUB> = (1.04147 ± 0.00062) × 10<SUP>-2</SUP>, Ω<SUB>b</SUB>h<SUP>2</SUP> = 0.02205 ± 0.00028, Ω<SUB>c</SUB>h<SUP>2</SUP> = 0.1199 ± 0.0027, and n<SUB>s</SUB> = 0.9603 ± 0.0073, respectively(note that in this abstract we quote 68% errors on measured parameters and 95% upper limits on other parameters). For this cosmology, we find a low value of the Hubble constant, H<SUB>0</SUB> = (67.3 ± 1.2) km s<SUP>-1</SUP> Mpc<SUP>-1</SUP>, and a high value of the matter density parameter, Ω<SUB>m</SUB> = 0.315 ± 0.017. These values are in tension with recent direct measurements of H<SUB>0</SUB> and the magnitude-redshift relation for Type Ia supernovae, but are in excellent agreement with geometrical constraints from baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) surveys. Including curvature, we find that the Universe is consistent with spatial flatness to percent level precision using Planck CMB data alone. We use high-resolution CMB data together with Planck to provide greater control on extragalactic foreground components in an investigation of extensions to the six-parameter ΛCDM model. We present selected results from a large grid of cosmological models, using a range of additional astrophysical data sets in addition to Planck and high-resolution CMB data. None of these models are favoured over the standard six-parameter ΛCDM cosmology. The deviation of the scalar spectral index from unity isinsensitive to the addition of tensor modes and to changes in the matter content of the Universe. We find an upper limit of r<SUB>0.002</SUB>< 0.11 on the tensor-to-scalar ratio. There is no evidence for additional neutrino-like relativistic particles beyond the three families of neutrinos in the standard model. Using BAO and CMB data, we find N<SUB>eff</SUB> = 3.30 ± 0.27 for the effective number of relativistic degrees of freedom, and an upper limit of 0.23 eV for the sum of neutrino masses. Our results are in excellent agreement with big bang nucleosynthesis and the standard value of N<SUB>eff</SUB> = 3.046. We find no evidence for dynamical dark energy; using BAO and CMB data, the dark energy equation of state parameter is constrained to be w = -1.13<SUB>-0.10</SUB><SUP>+0.13</SUP>. We also use the Planck data to set limits on a possible variation of the fine-structure constant, dark matter annihilation and primordial magnetic fields. Despite the success of the six-parameter ΛCDM model in describing the Planck data at high multipoles, we note that this cosmology does not provide a good fit to the temperature power spectrum at low multipoles. The unusual shape of the spectrum in the multipole range 20 ≲ ℓ ≲ 40 was seen previously in the WMAP data and is a real feature of the primordial CMB anisotropies. The poor fit to the spectrum at low multipoles is not of decisive significance, but is an "anomaly" in an otherwise self-consistent analysis of the Planck temperature data.

ADS

📄 Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

Quicklook:
Planck Collaboration et al. (2020) · Astronomy and Astrophysics
Reads: 10435 · Citations: 17687
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833910

🔗 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...641A...6P/abstract

#Astronomy #Astrophysics #Cosmology #CosmicBackgroundRadiation #CosmologicalParameters

Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

We present cosmological parameter results from the final full-mission Planck measurements of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies, combining information from the temperature and polarization maps and the lensing reconstruction. Compared to the 2015 results, improved measurements of large-scale polarization allow the reionization optical depth to be measured with higher precision, leading to significant gains in the precision of other correlated parameters. Improved modelling of the small-scale polarization leads to more robust constraints on many parameters, with residual modelling uncertainties estimated to affect them only at the 0.5σ level. We find good consistency with the standard spatially-flat 6-parameter ΛCDM cosmology having a power-law spectrum of adiabatic scalar perturbations (denoted "base ΛCDM" in this paper), from polarization, temperature, and lensing, separately and in combination. A combined analysis gives dark matter density Ω<SUB>c</SUB>h<SUP>2</SUP> = 0.120 ± 0.001, baryon density Ω<SUB>b</SUB>h<SUP>2</SUP> = 0.0224 ± 0.0001, scalar spectral index n<SUB>s</SUB> = 0.965 ± 0.004, and optical depth τ = 0.054 ± 0.007 (in this abstract we quote 68% confidence regions on measured parameters and 95% on upper limits). The angular acoustic scale is measured to 0.03% precision, with 100θ<SUB>*</SUB> = 1.0411 ± 0.0003. These results are only weakly dependent on the cosmological model and remain stable, with somewhat increased errors, in many commonly considered extensions. Assuming the base-ΛCDM cosmology, the inferred (model-dependent) late-Universe parameters are: Hubble constant H<SUB>0</SUB> = (67.4 ± 0.5) km s<SUP>-1</SUP> Mpc<SUP>-1</SUP>; matter density parameter Ω<SUB>m</SUB> = 0.315 ± 0.007; and matter fluctuation amplitude σ<SUB>8</SUB> = 0.811 ± 0.006. We find no compelling evidence for extensions to the base-ΛCDM model. Combining with baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements (and considering single-parameter extensions) we constrain the effective extra relativistic degrees of freedom to be N<SUB>eff</SUB> = 2.99 ± 0.17, in agreement with the Standard Model prediction N<SUB>eff</SUB> = 3.046, and find that the neutrino mass is tightly constrained to ∑m<SUB>ν</SUB> < 0.12 eV. The CMB spectra continue to prefer higher lensing amplitudes than predicted in base ΛCDM at over 2σ, which pulls some parameters that affect the lensing amplitude away from the ΛCDM model; however, this is not supported by the lensing reconstruction or (in models that also change the background geometry) BAO data. The joint constraint with BAO measurements on spatial curvature is consistent with a flat universe, Ω<SUB>K</SUB> = 0.001 ± 0.002. Also combining with Type Ia supernovae (SNe), the dark-energy equation of state parameter is measured to be w<SUB>0</SUB> = -1.03 ± 0.03, consistent with a cosmological constant. We find no evidence for deviations from a purely power-law primordial spectrum, and combining with data from BAO, BICEP2, and Keck Array data, we place a limit on the tensor-to-scalar ratio r<SUB>0.002</SUB> < 0.06. Standard big-bang nucleosynthesis predictions for the helium and deuterium abundances for the base-ΛCDM cosmology are in excellent agreement with observations. The Planck base-ΛCDM results are in good agreement with BAO, SNe, and some galaxy lensing observations, but in slight tension with the Dark Energy Survey's combined-probe results including galaxy clustering (which prefers lower fluctuation amplitudes or matter density parameters), and in significant, 3.6σ, tension with local measurements of the Hubble constant (which prefer a higher value). Simple model extensions that can partially resolve these tensions are not favoured by the Planck data.

ADS

Not in Leiden…

It’s been a very busy day back to teaching after last week’s study break. This week there’s a big meeting in Leiden (Netherlands) which I would like to have attended as it combines the annual Euclid Consortium meeting with the 56th ESLAB Symposium. No doubt there’ll be a lot of discussion of the Euclid Q1 results announced last week. I can’t go, however, because of teaching commitments. The Euclid meetings are quite often scheduled in the summer, so I have a chance to attend, but not this time.

Anyway, I thought I would post a relevant memory from a previous trip to Leiden, about 30 years ago. which was taken at a conference in Leiden (Netherlands) in 1995. Was that really 30 years ago? Various shady characters masquerading as “experts” were asked by the audience of graduate students at a summer school to give their favoured values for the cosmological parameters (from top to bottom: the Hubble constant, density parameter, cosmological constant, curvature parameter and age of the Universe):

From left to right we have Alain Blanchard (AB), Bernard Jones (BJ, standing), John Peacock (JP), me (yes, with a beard and a pony tail – the shame of it), Vincent Icke (VI), Rien van de Weygaert (RW) and Peter Katgert (PK, standing). You can see on the blackboard that the only one to get anywhere close to correctly predicting the parameters of what would become the standard cosmological model was, in fact, Rien van de Weygaert…

#cosmologicalParameters #Cosmology #Leiden

Home - Euclid ESLAB 2025 - Cosmos

Euclid ESLAB 2025
Motion of satellite galaxies suggests younger universe

In standard cosmological models, the formation of cosmological structures begins with the emergence of small structures, which subsequently undergo hierarchical merging, leading to the formation of larger systems. As the universe ages, massive galaxy groups and clusters, being the largest systems, tend to increase in mass and reach a more dynamically relaxed state.

Phys.org