Hey #php developers out there 👀 👋

What tools do you use to make your #ai write "good" code? 😏

#phpstan, #psalm, #mago, cs-fixer, #coderabbit...? 🤔
What's your most important tool? 🤔 #coding

NBC News Top Stories | Anyone can code with AI. But it might come with a hidden cost. by Jared Perlo

Anyone can code with AI. But it might come with a hidden cost. Apps and platforms allow novice and veteran coders to generate more code more easily, presenting significant quality and security tradeoffs. Over the past year, AI systems have become so advanced that users without significant coding or computer science experience can now spin up websites or apps simply by giving instructions to a chatbot. Yet with the rise of AI systems powerful enough to translate the instructions into tomes of code, experts and software engineers are torn over whether the technology will lead to an explosion of bloated, error-riddled software or instead supercharge security efforts by reviewing code faster and more effectively than humans.

AI systems don’t make typos in the way we make typos,” said David Loker, head of AI for CodeRabbit, a company that helps software engineers and organizations review and improve the quality of their code. “But they make a lot of mistakes across the board, with readability and maintainability of the code chief among them.” Coding has long been an art and a science. Since the days of coding computer systems by punch cards in the mid-20th century, conveying computing instructions has been a challenge of elegance and efficiency for computer scientists. But inside today’s leading AI companies, most coding is performed by AI systems themselves, with human software engineers functioning more as coaches or high-level architects rather than in-the-weeds mechanics. Anthropic’s head of Claude Code, Boris Cherny, said on X that AI has written 100% of his code since at least December. “I don’t even make small edits by hand,” Cherny said.

The rise of AI-assisted coding — also called vibe coding — is simultaneously allowing people who have never coded before to unleash their creativity and enabling experienced software engineers to dramatically expand the amount of code they write. “The initial push of all this was developer productivity,” Loker told NBC News. “It was about increasing the throughput in terms of feature generation, the ability to build fast and ship things.” Though AI-coding systems have become significantly more capable even since November, they often fail to understand entire repositories of code as fully as experienced human developers. For example, Loker said, “AI coding systems might duplicate functionality in multiple different locations because they didn’t find that that function already existed, so they re-create it over and over and over again.” Now you end up with a sprawling problem. If you update a function in one spot and you don’t update it in the other, you have different business logic in different areas that don’t line up. You’re left wondering what’s going on. With AI coding systems supercharging the amount of code being created, experts wonder whether code will be the next victim of the AI slop onslaught. The concept of AI slop was originally popularized in 2024 as AI systems became capable and pervasive enough to start churning out volumes of low-quality, unwanted AI outputs — from AI-generated photos to unhelpful AI-powered search results. On one hand, AI coding systems are producing vast amounts of serviceable but imperfect code. On the other hand, those same systems are quickly getting better at reviewing their own code and finding security vulnerabilities.

Read more: https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/security/ai-code-vibe-claude-openai-chatgpt-rcna258807

#davidloker #coderabbit #aisystems #softwareengineers #aislop

Anyone can code with AI. But it might come with a hidden cost.

Apps and platforms allow novice and veteran coders to generate more code more easily, presenting significant quality and security tradeoffs.

NBC News

Oikon (@oikon48)

발표 자료 공유: (즉석) 발표에서 CodeRabbit CLI와 Claude Code의 연동에 관해 다룸. 발표 자료는 Speaker Deck에 업로드되어 있음 — CodeRabbit CLI와 Claude Code 간의 통합 사례 및 설명을 담은 자료 공개.

https://x.com/oikon48/status/2013933217330368587

#coderabbit #claude #cli #integration

Oikon (@oikon48) on X

本日の登壇資料です🐇 (ほぼ)飛び込み登壇でした笑 CodeRabbit CLI + Claude Codeの連携について https://t.co/o5fIPfsJZq #CR_UG

X (formerly Twitter)
Created a Rails 8 Learning Repository and Started Recovering from a 6-Year Blank with Rails Guides and Claude Code | Masutaka's ChangeLog Memo https://masutaka.net/en/2025-12-30-1/ #rails #claude_code #coderabbit
Created a Rails 8 Learning Repository and Started Recovering from a 6-Year Blank with Rails Guides and Claude Code

Last month I changed jobs and returned to Rails development after a long time. With a 6-year gap and only one month available for learning, I needed to efficiently grasp Rails 8’s new features and refresh my memory of existing ones. So I decided to learn by building a working app together with Claude Code while referencing the Rails Guides. I temporarily subscribed to Claude Code’s Max plan at USD 100/mo.

Masutaka's ChangeLog Memo
CodeRabbitを個人開発で使ってみた。 - Qiita

この記事はAIコードレビューサービスCodeRabbitを使った経験をシェアしよう! by CodeRabbit Advent Calendar 2025、20日目の投稿でした。。 大遅刻してすいません。。 始めに 個人開発をしていると、自分の書いたコードが本当に正しいの...

Qiita

KI Assistenten produzieren deutlich mehr fehlerhaften Code
Eine Auswertung von CodeRabbit stellt die Zuverlässigkeit von KI-Codetools infrage. Demnach enthält von KI erzeugter Code deutlich mehr Fehler und Sicherheitslücken als von Menschen geschriebener.

Mehr Probleme in KI Pull
https://www.apfeltalk.de/magazin/news/ki-assistenten-produzieren-deutlich-mehr-fehlerhaften-code/
#KI #News #Bugs #Code #CodeRabbit #CVE #KI #KnstlicheIntelligenz #Microsoft #Sicherheit #Softwareentwicklung

KI Assistenten produzieren deutlich mehr fehlerhaften Code

Neue Daten von CodeRabbit zeigen: KI-generierter Code enthält deutlich mehr Fehler und Sicherheitslücken als menschlicher.

Apfeltalk Magazin

Accelerate your code reviews with CodeRabbit's Agentic Code Validation! Dive into its intricacies and see how it can free up time, enhance understanding, and streamline processes. A definitive tool for every developer!

Read all about it on  here:
https://foojay.io/today/how-coderabbits-agentic-code-validation-helps-with-code-reviews/

#Java #Foojay #CodeReview #CodeRabbit 🚀    🐇 💻

How CodeRabbit's Agentic Code Validation helps with code reviews

Instead of chasing higher benchmark scores or relying on traditional metrics, CodeRabbit focuses on how AI systems actually perform in live engineering environments through custom evaluation methods, some visible directly on the PRs we review.

foojay

🐰 A rabbit hops through rate-limit gates,
With stores of JSON, PDO's states,
When seconds fly and day-counts fall,
We wait or throw—the RateLimiter's call!
ApiClient sleeps, then tries once more,
With headers tracked from server's door. 🎉

Pull request https://github.com/VitexSoftware/php-vitexsoftware-rbczpremiumapi/issues/5 #Poem by #CodeRabbit #AI 

Support Rate Limiting headers · Issue #5 · VitexSoftware/php-vitexsoftware-rbczpremiumapi

The number of requests in each API operation is limited to 10 per client per sliding second and 5000 per client per sliding day. The exception is the 'Download Statement' operation with the limits ...

GitHub

Zkouším CodeRabbit. Chápu, že je to pro jiné lidi, než jednočlenné solopreneurs, kteří všechno mastí do hlavní větve a pouze občas vytvoří Pull Request, ale když už jsem ho teda vytvořil, dostal jsem tunu nepotřebného textu, ASCII art, básničku a 3 critical komentáře, které vychází z nepochopení toho, jak projekt funguje.

Na menším a standardnějším projektu by to něco vychytat mohlo, dám tomu ještě šanci, ale ta 1st time experience je stejně jako u agentů příšerná.

#ai #coderabbit #juniorguru