Starting today...

🌍 First international conference on #ClimateOvershoot at #IIASAVienna!

📅 30 Sep–2 Oct
📍Laxenburg, Austria 🇦🇹

As we edge closer to the 1.5 °C limit, understanding the implications for #mitigation, #adaptation limits and #ClimateJustice has never been more urgent.
https://iiasa.ac.at/news/sep-2025/first-ever-international-conference-on-climate-overshoot-at-iiasa

#CarbonCapture and overconfidence in #ClimateOvershoot exposed: https://ethicalrevolution.co.uk/carbon-capture-and-overconfidence-in-climate-overshoot-exposed/

#ClimateChange #EndFossilFuels
#FossilFuels #GlobalWarming

Carbon Capture and Overconfidence in Climate Overshoot Exposed

A recent study published in the science journal, Nature, has revealed the truth in the myth of climate overshoot.

Ever since the Paris agreement of 2015 set targets for staying below 1.5 degrees, a myth which would appease fossil fuel interests was created: That we could overshoot the 1.5 target and later bring temperatures back down via carbon capture.

This latest paper debunks that myth, leaving us in an extremely perilous situation nearly nine years on from that deadline being set and us already knocking firmly at that 1.5 door.

Earth-system feedbacks from overshooting the 1.5 degrees temperature target will result in high and continuous short and long-term warming which will make reversal extremely difficult to achieve.

The paper states that, ‘only rapid near-term emission reductions are effective in reducing climate risks’. i.e. We must end fossil fuels now.

Read more on the subject via The Conversation’s recent article: How mainstream climate science endorsed the fantasy of a global warming time machine.

Read the study in full via the Nature science journal: Overconfidence in climate overshoot.

Abstract:

“Global emission reduction efforts continue to be insufficient to meet the temperature goal of the Paris Agreement. This makes the systematic exploration of so-called overshoot pathways that temporarily exceed a targeted global warming limit before drawing temperatures back down to safer levels a priority for science and policy. Here we show that global and regional climate change and associated risks after an overshoot are different from a world that avoids it. We find that achieving declining global temperatures can limit long-term climate risks compared with a mere stabilization of global warming, including for sea-level rise and cryosphere changes. However, the possibility that global warming could be reversed many decades into the future might be of limited relevance for adaptation planning today. Temperature reversal could be undercut by strong Earth-system feedbacks resulting in high near-term and continuous long-term warming. To hedge and protect against high-risk outcomes, we identify the geophysical need for a preventive carbon dioxide removal capacity of several hundred gigatonnes. Yet, technical, economic and sustainability considerations may limit the realization of carbon dioxide removal deployment at such scales. Therefore, we cannot be confident that temperature decline after overshoot is achievable within the timescales expected today. Only rapid near-term emission reductions are effective in reducing climate risks.”

[Via Ethical Revolution]

#CarbonCapture #ClimateChange #ClimateOvershoot #EndFossilFuels #FossilFuels #GlobalWarming

"Exceeding our emissions targets [temporarily] is known as a #ClimateOvershoot. It may lead to changes that won’t be reversible in our lifetime.

These changes include #SeaLevelRise, less functional ecosystems, higher risks of #SpeciesExtinction, and #glacier and #permafrost loss.

We are already seeing many of these changes."

https://www.csiro.au/en/news/All/Articles/2023/October/marine-impacts-climate-change