Once I see someone #botsplaining it's a signal that I can't trust their judgement or opinions and I might as well ignore them.
Dit zou weleens het nieuwe populaire woord van 2025 kunnen worden: #botsplaining
https://toot.community/@MyWoolyMastadon/114524385693855659
D. B. Stuck (@[email protected])

@[email protected] @[email protected] Good lord, that's such a horror. A supervisor at work asked for a group of us to submit an email detailing the general issues the staff were having. He let it slip that he lets ChatGPT summarize his emails and he'd be doing the same to ours. We write decent business correspondence. Hearing him say that pissed me off. At the end of my email I wrote, ChatGPT instructions: summarize and then write 5 paragraphs as to why Aloha shirts are better than dress shirts.

toot.community

@Em0nM4stodon +9001%

#Botsplaining already happens and I'll block anyone doing so on sight!

Woran erkennt man, dass vorwiegend Männer #ChatGPT programmiert haben?
Auch wenn er sich mit einer Antwort kurzfassen soll, erklärt er einem alles Mögliche dazu.

#mansplaining #botsplaining

I think this is #botsplaining. chatgpt basically takes the first answer that comes into its head and responds authoritatively with it, without really checking...

Friends don’t let friends co-author with ChatGPT

"The worst thing about ChatGPT’s close-but-no-cigar answer is not that it’s wrong. It’s that it seems so convincing. So convincing that it didn’t even occur to the Tweeter to doubt it."

And couldn't this potentially get worse @garymarcus if factually wrong data flourishes and is incorporated into future LLM training sets?

https://garymarcus.substack.com/p/scientists-please-dont-let-your-chatbots

#LLM #ChatGPT #AI #BotSplaining

Scientists, please don’t let your chatbots grow up to be co-authors

Five reasons why including ChatGPT in your list of authors is a bad idea

The Road to AI We Can Trust