That They May Know Him

The Bible in a Year

“They shall know that I am the Lord their God, that brought them forth out of the land of Egypt, that I may dwell among them: I am the Lord their God.”
Exodus 29:46

As we move steadily through the Scriptures together, Exodus 29:46 invites us to pause and consider a single verse that gathers together the heart of God’s redemptive intent. These words come at the conclusion of detailed instructions concerning the Tabernacle and the consecration of Israel’s priests. After the measurements, rituals, garments, and sacrifices, God reminds His people why all of this exists. The structure is not the point. The priesthood is not the end. The purpose is relational: “They shall know that I am the Lord their God.” Before God speaks of dwelling among them, He speaks of being known by them.

The knowledge described here is not mere information. In Hebrew thought, to “know” (yadaʿ) implies relational familiarity born of lived experience. God’s purpose in redeeming Israel was not simply to form a nation or establish religious order, but to make Himself known to them as their God. This challenges the way many of us approach faith today. We often settle for knowing about God—His attributes, His actions, His commands—while neglecting the deeper pursuit of knowing Him. A.W. Tozer once observed, “What comes into our minds when we think about God is the most important thing about us.” Scripture presses us further: it is not only what we think about God, but whether we truly know Him, that shapes faithful living.

God’s purpose is inseparable from His power. The verse continues, “that brought them forth out of the land of Egypt.” Israel’s knowledge of God was grounded in history, not abstraction. They knew Him as Deliverer before they knew Him as Indweller. The plagues, the Passover, the crossing of the Red Sea—these were not isolated miracles but revelations of divine power directed toward salvation. At the same time, that same power brought judgment upon Egypt. God’s might was displayed both in rescuing His people and in confronting hardened resistance. As Scripture repeatedly reminds us, “The Lord is a warrior; the Lord is His name” (Exodus 15:3, italics mine). Power is not an optional attribute of God; it is essential to His identity and to our understanding of redemption.

This balance between salvation and judgment remains instructive. Modern faith often emphasizes God’s saving power while quietly minimizing His authority to judge. Yet Exodus will not allow such division. The God who saves is also the God who rules. His power does not fluctuate according to human preference. For the believer, this is not a threat but a reassurance. The same power that once broke the grip of Egypt is at work to redeem, correct, and sustain God’s people today. Knowing God means trusting that His power is both purposeful and righteous.

The verse then reaches its most astonishing declaration: “that I may dwell among them.” God’s presence is not assumed; it is given by grace. Israel had proven repeatedly that they were a stiff-necked and rebellious people. Still, God desired to dwell in their midst. The Tabernacle was not a reward for obedience but a testimony to mercy. Moses understood this better than most. When faced with the possibility of entering the Promised Land without God’s presence, he pleaded, “If Your presence does not go with us, do not bring us up from here” (Exodus 33:15, italics mine). For Moses, the presence of God mattered more than progress, security, or success.

That same question confronts us today. Do we value God’s presence more than outcomes? Do we desire Him, or merely what He provides? God’s dwelling among His people foreshadows the greater reality fulfilled in Christ. John declares, “And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us” (John 1:14, italics mine). The God who once filled the Tabernacle with glory has chosen to make His home among us through His Son and by His Spirit. This presence is still an act of grace, not entitlement.

Finally, the verse closes with a reaffirmation of God’s person: “I am the Lord their God.” The name “LORD,” rendered in all capital letters, signifies YHWH—Jehovah, the covenant God revealed to Moses as “I AM WHO I AM” (Exodus 3:14). This declaration draws a clear line of distinction. Israel’s God was not one among many; He was wholly other, self-existent, and faithful. Any alternative deity was a distortion by comparison. As Walter Brueggemann notes, “The claim of YHWH is exclusive not because of insecurity, but because of truth.” To know God rightly is to reject lesser substitutes that cannot save, sustain, or dwell with us.

As we journey through the Bible this year, Exodus 29:46 reminds us what Scripture ultimately seeks to do. It reveals God’s purpose, displays His power, invites us into His presence, and grounds us in His person. The Bible is not merely a record of religious development; it is a testimony to a God who desires to be known. Our task is not to rush past that invitation, but to respond with reverent attention and faithful trust, allowing the knowledge of God to shape every other knowledge we pursue.

For further reflection on God’s presence dwelling among His people, see this article from Ligonier Ministries:
https://www.ligonier.org/learn/articles/god-dwelling-with-his-people

FEEL FREE TO COMMENT, SUBSCRIBE, AND REPOST, SO OTHERS MAY KNOW

From Shadows to Substance

Holding Fast to the Better Hope
Thru the Bible in a Year

As we move together through Hebrews 6–9, we are invited into a conversation that is both deeply theological and quietly pastoral. The letter to the Hebrews was written to believers who carried the weight of a long religious memory. They had been raised in Judaism, shaped by sacrifices, priesthood, covenants, and sacred spaces. These ceremonial practices were not mere habits; they were formative, identity-defining rhythms. The writer of Hebrews does not dismiss these practices, nor does he ridicule them. Instead, he honors their purpose while gently, firmly guiding believers forward—away from reliance on shadows and toward confidence in the substance found in Christ.

Hebrews 6:1–19 pauses the theological argument to address the spiritual condition of the readers. It is, as many commentators have noted, a pastoral interruption. The author calls the community toward consecration, urging them not to remain forever at the starting line of faith. The language of “moving on to maturity” is not harsh but hopeful. It recognizes that faith is meant to grow. At the same time, the passage speaks soberly about the danger of rejection. To turn away after receiving enlightenment is not a casual decision; it carries lasting consequences. Yet the tone quickly shifts to encouragement. God, we are told, does not forget the work and love shown by the saints. Their labor matters. Their perseverance is seen. The exhortation is clear: keep following Christ with earnestness, anchored by hope rather than paralyzed by fear.

That anchor image is crucial. The writer describes hope as “an anchor for the soul, firm and secure” (Hebrews 6:19). This is not optimism rooted in circumstances but assurance grounded in God’s character and promise. The anchor holds because it is secured not in human effort but in Christ Himself, who has gone before us. Even before the discussion turns explicitly back to priesthood, the groundwork is laid: Christian perseverance rests on who Christ is and where He stands on our behalf.

Beginning in Hebrews 6:20 and extending through 8:5, the focus returns to Christ as High Priest. Here the mysterious figure of Melchizedek becomes central. For Jewish believers, this comparison would have been startling and illuminating. Melchizedek appears briefly in Genesis, yet the author of Hebrews sees in him a divinely intended pattern. Repeatedly—seven times—the text emphasizes that Christ’s priesthood follows this older, greater order. Melchizedek represents righteousness and peace, timelessness and continuity. Unlike Aaron’s priesthood, which was bound to genealogy, mortality, and repetition, Christ’s priesthood is eternal and unbroken.

The contrast is carefully drawn. Aaron’s descendants served faithfully, yet their ministry was limited. They could not bring perfection, because death interrupted their service and sin required endless sacrifice. Christ, by contrast, lives forever. His priesthood does not pass to another. He does not minister in a copy or shadow, but in the true reality. F.F. Bruce observes that the Levitical priests “stood daily at their service,” while Christ “sat down,” signaling completion and authority. The difference is not one of degree, but of kind. What was partial has given way to what is whole.

This naturally leads into the discussion of covenants in Hebrews 8:6–9:28. Christ is described as the mediator of a new covenant, one founded on better promises. The reason for this new covenant is not that the old was malicious or misguided, but that it was insufficient to address the deeper problem of the human heart. The law could instruct and restrain, but it could not transform. The new covenant, promised in Jeremiah and fulfilled in Christ, addresses this directly. God’s law is written on hearts, not merely tablets. Forgiveness is decisive, not provisional.

The contrasts the author draws are vivid and instructive. Under the old covenant, worship centered on an earthly tabernacle—a sacred space carefully constructed but ultimately temporary. Under the new covenant, Christ ministers in the true tabernacle, the heavenly reality to which the earthly one pointed. Under the old covenant, animal sacrifices were offered repeatedly, their blood symbolically cleansing but never fully effective. Under the new covenant, Christ offers Himself once for all. His blood is efficacious. It accomplishes what it signifies.

Hebrews 9 makes clear that repetition itself was a sign of incompleteness. If the sacrifices had truly dealt with sin, they would not have needed to be repeated year after year. Christ’s single offering, however, decisively addresses sin and opens the way into God’s presence. As the text declares, “He has appeared once for all at the culmination of the ages to do away with sin by the sacrifice of himself” (Hebrews 9:26). What was anticipated has arrived. What was promised has been fulfilled.

For those of us walking through Scripture today, this section of Hebrews calls us to examine where we place our confidence. It is possible, even for sincere believers, to cling to religious patterns while missing the freedom and assurance Christ provides. The original readers were tempted to retreat to familiar systems under pressure. We may be tempted to rely on habits, performance, or spiritual busyness instead of resting in Christ’s finished work. Hebrews gently but firmly redirects our gaze.

The message is not to abandon discipline or reverence, but to anchor both in Christ. Our obedience flows from what He has done, not from anxiety about what remains undone. Our hope is secured not by repetition, but by trust in the One who lives forever to intercede for us. This is not a call to spiritual complacency, but to mature confidence.

As you continue this year-long journey through the Bible, remember that God’s Word is forming you, even when the themes feel complex or demanding. Hebrews asks us to think deeply, but it also invites us to rest securely. The same God who established the patterns of old has brought them to fulfillment in His Son. His purposes are coherent, faithful, and complete.

Thank you for your commitment to studying the Word of God. Scripture assures us that God’s Word will not return void, but will accomplish what He desires and achieve the purpose for which He sent it. Each day you remain in the text, you are being shaped more than you realize.

For further study, you may find this resource helpful:
https://www.biblegateway.com/resources/commentaries/IVP-NT/Hebrews

FEEL FREE TO COMMENT, SUBSCRIBE, AND REPOST, SO OTHERS MAY KNOW

Who is the mysterious Priest-King who met Abraham — and why does he matter today? 👑

Discover how this ancient encounter points to Jesus and our calling as a restored people.

👉 Read now: https://hearingandobeying.org/2025/11/01/meeting-the-mysterious-priest-king-genesis-series-13/

#Genesis #Melchizedek #Restoration #Messiah #BiblicalTheology #abraham #abram

Explore the cosmic battle of the War of the Angels in Revelation 12! Michael vs. Satan in a divine showdown that affirms God’s ultimate victory.

https://assemblybethesda.com/the-war-of-angels-in-the-biblical-context/

#BiblicalTheology #SpiritualWarfare #Faith

"Exploring the story of Lot’s wife turning into a pillar of salt Her glance back cost her everything—will we trust God’s path forward? 🙏 #LotsWife #BiblicalTheology #DivineJudgment #ObedienceToGod"

https://assemblybethesda.com/why-lots-wife-turned-salt/

The Holy Bible is the cornerstone of Christianity and has profoundly transformed the minds of great thinkers throughout the course of human history. Nevertheless, many people in our current generation have questioned its relevance in context of our ‘post-modern’ world. Now, the Christian faith would argue differently. In this inquiry, we will have a discussion as to why the Bible can still be seen as relevant for today’s moral landscape. We are going to explore both some of the criticisms concerning the Bible, and then some theological responses that can demonstrate its enduring words. 

Why Some would say that the Bible is ‘Outdated’: 

Historical Context: Some critics of the Bible tend to argue that the Bible reflects an era that is way beyond our current moral and cultural threshold as a collective society. Some evidence that’s normally presented is that its teachings are founded upon outdated social norms, and that their scientific understanding was more … superstitious rather than factual. This also leads to the highlighting of certain passages that seemingly ‘condone slavery’ or contradict scientific discoveries. 
 
Incompatibility with modern science: Another popular reason is that biblical critics believe that the Bible is in contradiction with modern ‘scientific findings’. They look at verses such as Genesis 1:3 where it describes the creation of the world to have happened over six days. As you might already know, scientific study suggests otherwise. It suggests that the universe is billions of years old, and that the formation of life on Earth, along with its broad diversification of species, occurred over a vast stretch of time. They suggest that there is no tangible evidence that the universe was just ‘spoken into being‘ by a divine and supreme God. 

So Many Interpretations: The difficulty of interpreting scripture can indeed contribute to its perceived irrelevance in society. There are so many doctrinal differences and denominational splits that they have become overwhelming. For example, there are more than 45,000 denominations (which include sub-groups) that are socially recognised. Different denominations and individuals emphasise on different passages and ideas, leading to an amalgamation of contradictory doctrines. This inconsistency makes scripture seem unreliable and open to the manipulation by those who have their own self-serving motives. 
 
Secondly, it doesn’t help when religious leaders can never seem to agree on the meaning of scripture. This can often weaken the perception of its textual authority as a source of moral truth to those who aren’t Christian. This causes many people in society to be less inclined to look to God’s word for guidance if there is no clear consensus of understanding on its primary message. 
 

Contradictions: The Bible’s vast scope and authorship then raise questions about inconsistencies and potential errors amongst its critics. The Bible’s vast thematic scope and authorship presents a significant challenge in terms of those who want to understand its overall message. The Bible was compiled over the course of more than a millennium (around 1,600 years) by numerous authors from diverse backgrounds. The Bible incorporates a wide range of genres, from historical accounts and legal codes, poetry, proverbs, and apocalyptic visions. This variety can, of course, lead to seeming contradictions if one were to read it out of context. 
 
Similarly, discrepancies can arise when cross-checking facts across different books. For example, a supposed contradiction arises when comparing Genesis 32:30 and John 1:18. In Genesis, Jacob claims to have “seen God face to face” after wrestling with a mysterious figure. John, however, states that “no one has seen God at any time.” This apparent clash can cause confusion. These inconsistencies raise questions about the accuracy and reliability of Biblical texts, particularly for those approaching it from a purely historical or literal standpoint. Detractors would therefore argue that a divinely inspired text should then be free from discrepancies such as this, which cast doubt on the Bible’s absolute truth. 

A simple Counter-Argument

Defending the Bible’s Relevance: 

While the criticisms mentioned raise valid points, it’s important to consider how true believers of the Christian faith would address the issues mentioned above. First, the Bible itself acknowledges its historical context through various means, including references to specific customs, rulers, and geographic locations. 

Secondly, dietary laws in the book of Leviticus, such as restrictions on certain meats, were informed by their underlying agricultural practices and scientific understanding of the ancient world. By understanding the historical context, we can see that these restrictions were not meant to be universally applied dietary principles throughout history, but rather practices relevant to the health and well-being of the Israelites at that time. However, some would even argue that if it were good for them during their time, it probably would be good for us too now; especially since we live in a generation with stores that are full of unhealthy snacks and processed foods. 

The authors also wrote to specific audiences within their own cultures, and it would be unjust to try and understand biblical principles without context of its audience. We cannot just open a text that is compiled of 66 different books (or 84 if you are from the Tewahedo Church), with different authors and literary styles, and expect to know everything it is intending to say in the time it was written. It is vital to note that without proper theological and historical context, we are at risk to lose its true theological substance. It is for this reason that we take the time to understand the context behind what is written in scripture, as it helps us to interpret the enduring moral principles of God’s word that transcends beyond time. 

We can really see the importance of contextualisation when we expand on the reasoning behind slavery in the Old Testament. For instance, the condemnation of slavery in the Old Testament, while existing within the social context of the time, speaks to a universal truth about how God values the practice of expressing a human dignity that applies across cultures and history. Even though the specific practices of slavery differed from ours, the Bible’s message that all people are created equal and deserving of respect remains eternally relevant in today’s context. 

The Old Testament lays out numerous laws protecting slaves, limiting their work hours, and ensuring their fair treatment. These regulations, while existing within a world where slavery was common, planted the seeds for the eventual abolition of slavery throughout history. For example, Exodus 21:16 even states: “Whoever steals a man and sells him, and anyone found in possession of him, must be put to death.” This verse demonstrates the seriousness with which kidnapping and enslavement were viewed. 

Then, Leviticus 25:39-40 outlines restrictions on how long an Israelite could be enslaved to another Israelite, and even mandates their release in the seventh year or Jubilee year: “If any of your dependent Israelites become so poor that they sell themselves to you, you must not make them do the work of a slave; treat them rather as your hired worker or helper, and they will be with you until the year of Jubilee. Then they and their children will be released from you, and they will go back to their own clan and return to the land of their fathers.” These regulations, while not outlawing slavery altogether during their time, established a guideline that promoted a more humane system and paved the way for a more just society for the people of Israel. 

On the topic of interpretation, Christianity recognizes the complexity of scripture. This is why tradition and reason play a role alongside individual interpretation. Through these tools, Christians can discern the Bible’s core message while acknowledging the presence of different perspectives within the text. The existence of various interpretations does not negate the Bible’s moral relevance; it highlights the richness and depth of its message, offering guidance for a wide range of situations. 

Finally, regarding inconsistencies, some apparent contradictions can be resolved through careful study of the text’s original languages and genres. Other seeming contradictions may reflect different perspectives within the narrative itself. The Bible is not a dry, scientific text; it is a collection of divinely inspired works that use various literary devices to convey God’s message. Understanding these complexities allows Christians to appreciate the Bible’s richness and its enduring moral relevance. 

In Summary… 

Timeless Morality: While cultural practices evolve, the Bible’s core ethical principles – love, justice, compassion – remain eternally relevant. Passages like Micah 6:8 (“do justice, love kindness, walk humbly with your God“) offer timeless guidance. 

Interpretative Nuance: The Bible benefits from informed interpretation. Understanding the historical context and literary devices employed by the writers’ sheds light on the intended meaning. Many passages are metaphorical or symbolic, not meant to be strictly literally translated as such. 

Unity in Diversity: Despite supposed seeming contradictions, the Bible’s overarching message – God’s love and plan for humanity – remains consistent throughout the scriptures. Different perspectives from various authors contribute to a richer foundation of faith. 

Scripture as a Guide: 

Meaning and Purpose: The Bible addresses humanity’s fundamental questions about existence, purpose, and morality. It offers answers in stories like the creation narrative in Genesis and teachings like the Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5-7). 

Comfort and Hope: The Bible provides solace in times of hardship. Psalms, for example, offer a language of lament and praise that resonates across cultures and centuries. 

Challenge and Change: The Bible calls for self-reflection and societal transformation. Passages like those found in the prophets Amos and Isaiah advocate for justice and challenge the status quo. 

The Bible’s enduring relevance lies in its ability to: 

Transcend Time: The core message of love, redemption, and God’s presence remains eternally applicable. 

Speak to the Human Condition: The Bible addresses universal human experiences – love, loss, suffering, and the search for meaning. 

Provide Guidance and Hope: The Bible offers a moral compass and a source of comfort in a complex world. 

Whether we approach the Bible with faith or with critical curiosity, its historical, literary, and philosophical significance is undeniable to both the critic and the believer. The evidence is just astonishing. Its ability to inspire, challenge, and guide people continues to resonate across all cultures and generations. 

If this post has blessed you, feel free to subscribe to our newsletter share this with someone who might find this interesting. May the Lord bless you and keep you. 

https://cotl.uk/2024/11/11/is-the-bible-still-relevant-today-some-criticisms-and-theological-responses/

#apologetics #bible #BibleInModernLife #bibleStudy #biblicalContext #biblicalCriticism #biblicalRelevance #biblicalTheology #biblicalValidity #ChristianFaithInTheModernWorld #ChristianLiving #ChristianWorldview #contradictionsInTheBible #cotl #DwightVanKan #IsTheBibleRelevantToday #RelevanceOfTheBible #Theology

Edward Hayes Plumptre, an Anglican dean, on James’ warning (2:14-17) on denying aid to the needy but reciting religious platitudes. Such do truly mock the souls by saying being filled by God their father is all they’ll get.

Today, are we concerned about the spiritually empty soul, but silent about those whose souls Plumptre says are “mocked”?

How can you give others things which are needful of the body?

#christian #thisisamerica #biblicaltheology #catechism #trustgodbro

This blog post explores the concept of eternal security, examining arguments on both sides and offering practical takeaways for your Christian walk. Discover what the Bible says about a believer's standing in Christ and how to live with confidence in God's grace.

#ChristianLiving #Salvation #EternalSecurity #ChristianAssurance #BiblicalTheology #FollowingChrist #NewBelievers #ChristianGrowth #GraceAndForgiveness #GodsLove #Lord #christianity #christian #bibleverse #bible #biblestudy
#salvationinchrist #SalvationInJesus #JesusIsLord #jesuschrist
#JesusIsKing #jesusisgod #canyouloseyoursalvation

https://livingforthechrist.com/can-a-christian-lose-their-salvation/

Edward Norris Kirk, Presbyterian minister and, missionary writes on providing education to former enslaved persons. He invokes Matthew 25 to warns of God’s wrath at those who would neglect the hungry or ignorant on the basis of skin color. He’s implying a special duty because of history or racism. Is this the kind of wrath that modern preachers like to talk about?

How can you help those in need of education or food?

#biblicaltheology #forthechurch #dogoodfeelgood #jesussaves #christian