Skeets McGeeJan 26, 2025
Should I make this my new header? #maga #badlegaltakes
Bluesky

Bluesky Social
Show threadAlex ChaffeeAug 2, 2023

@jsrailton

I saw an even more inane take from an actual* lawyer on one of the other sites:

“The First Amendment protects all speech!”

(*) but given that quote, there’s a solid chance he paid someone else to pass the bar for him

also “But it’s legally impossible to prove what he was thinking [when he ordered a coup]!”

#BadLegalTakes

Show threadVBLesJul 31, 2023

@realTuckFrumper

A.K.A. #badlegaltakes

Show threadLizardDec 23, 2022
@AriCohn We’ll get #BadLegalTakes over here soon enough.
Show threadhybrid havocDec 18, 2022
@Pwnallthethings this is why we need #BadLegalTakes. Already seeing what are probably bad #Section230 takes.
Show threadToSkinADonkeyDec 18, 2022
This isn't at all a negative thing, but would make an account like #badlegaltakes a lot harder to operate here and in some ways I think the ability to "dunk" on a person (or bot) who was there just to get a reaction brought with it a certain satisfaction that is missing from Mastodon. Again, don't think it's a bad thing, just different. I rather prefer civil discussion where we all agree on the facts and we can argue in the margins. Just strange to see in 2022.
LawyerLizDec 14, 2022
Funny thing about drafting policies: bad ideas + bad legal writing = unintended consequences will bite you in the *ss. In case you’re wondering how things are going on the bird site: Musty blocked the flight-tracking accts that he disliked and tried to change TOS. Under new TOS, lots of OSINT & other public avail info would suddenly be banned. Reversing course. Oopsie.
#badlegaltakes #tech #aviation #elonmuskjet #flightdata
schwartzsterNov 6, 2022
Enjoying the 🐦 meltdown immensely. Going to miss the #badlegaltakes a little though.