William Tullett

@wrtullett
167 Followers
91 Following
20 Posts
Academic who works on smells past, present, and future. First book: https://global.oup.com/academic/product/smell-in-eighteenth-century-england-9780192847454?lang=en&cc=gb. Second book: https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/smell-and-the-past-9781350367524/ (will be free pdf!). Main project right now: https://odeuropa.eu/. Help, I don't understand how this works. #smellstudies #envhist #smellhistory #envhum
Joined30 Oct 2022

Aktuelles Heft: #WerkstattGeschichte 87/2023 "reizende gerüche", im Thementeil, hg. v. Benjamin Brendel, 5 Artikel zu kultureller & sozialer Konstruktion olfaktorischer Wahrnehmungen & damit verbundener Emotionen im histor. Wandel, v. Sarah-Maria Schober (@sms), William Tullett (@wrtullett), Julia Gebke (https://twitter.com/@JuliaGebke), Christoph Lorke (https://twitter.com/@ChristophLorke) & B. Brendel.

https://werkstattgeschichte.de/alle_ausgaben/reizende-gerueche

@histodons @historikerinnen

#SmellStudies #SmellHistory #envhum #envhist #histodons

Julia Gebke (@JuliaGebke) / Twitter

Historian addicted to premodern stuff, especially to bodies and knowledge...

Twitter
(6/) The book is draws on a rich array of work from a range of scholars across the globe who work on smell. So please read the book alongside all this fantastic literature. You can find a constantly updated bibliography of interdisciplinary work here: https://zotero.org/groups/4530561/pastscent/library
Zotero | Your personal research assistant

(5/) The third chapter, 'Narratives', is perhaps the most radical. Through a discussion of smell's complex temporalities it argues that we can create historical publications and narratives in the form of odours rather than just texts. This means going beyond linear narratives. The final chapter ends on a call for scholars: A critical smell studies starts at the tip of the nose. So let’s follow it!
(4/) The second chapter, 'Archives' argues that smell archives exist, can be created, and can be excavated using multidisciplinary tools. These archives are also bodily and environmental. Historical shifts and disciplinary boundaries have made smell seem more ephemeral than it is.
(3/) The first chapter, 'Noses' argues that using our noses as historians helps us to understand our own and past olfactory subjectivities; re-odorize our archives; engage audiences; decolonize practice and thereby ‘articulate’ the relationship between olfactory past and present.
(2/) The introduction sets up a problem: sensory historians go on about how important the senses are, including smelling. But we very rarely use our noses and, in fact, some scholars have argued we shouldn't bother. I'm not convinced. The book's argument is that our understanding of the past and its relationship with the present is enriched by deploying human and more-than-human noses. One way the book does this is 'olfactory figures', where I encourage readers to 'sniff along'.
(1/) My new book 'Smell and the Past: Noses, Archives, Narratives' isn't out in hardback until May but the open access ebook has now been published online! https://bloomsburycollections.com/book/smell-and-the-past-noses-archives-narratives/ so please download, share, and read! It's part of my work on
the Odeuropa project and its open access publication was funded by our EU Horizon 2020 grant. It's split into three parts, as the title suggests: noses, archives, narratives. #sensorystudies #sensoryhistory #smellhistory #smellstudies #bodyhist #envhist
Bloomsbury Collections - Smell and the Past - Noses, Archives, Narratives

‘What if researchers interested in ‘the past’ used their noses? This open access book makes the case for a more imaginatively interdisciplinary approach to sensory heritage and history, arguing that we can and should engage our noses as a research tool for articulating the past.’ Assessing how both we and our ancestors approach, understand and conceptualise smell, Tullett shows how archives can be ‘re-odorized’ to uncover narratives that are only implicit in or obscured by the historical record. From perfume libraries to organic compounds emitted by historical objects, this book acts as a guide for employing our olfactory senses when researching and studying history in order to understand and communicate the past more fully. Employing ‘olfactory figures’ examples, Smell and the Past shows how historical narratives and arguments can be found through a structured olfactory experience, and demonstrates how our understanding of the past and its relationship with the present

How can soundscapes be used as a way to attend to forest life and the many different ways that we narrate and relate to forests?

The forestscapes project aims to explore and document generative arts-based methods for recomposing collections of sound materials to support “collective inquiry” into forests as living cultural landscapes.

As part of the project we have an open call for folders of forest sounds.

More at: https://jonathangray.org/2023/02/07/forestscapes

#forests #listening #soundscapes #norns #monome #nornsshield #supercollider #fieldrecording #forestbathing #ecology #bioacoustics #soundart #composition #environmentalhumanities #woods #woodlands #trees #sound #soundstudies #sonicarts #feministsts #sts #inventivemethods #collectiveinquiry

@Maudbo @samday @kingsdh @publicdatalab

Introducing forestscapes and open call for forest sounds | jonathangray.org – jonathan w. y. gray

critical engagements with digital data, methods and infrastructures

Given the piece in the Guardian today, in which I talk about some of the Christmas smells in our Odeuropa Smell Explorer, it seems to be a good time to ask: what smells do YOU associate with Christmas? Please boost, reply, or use the hashtag #festivefragrance - I'd love to get a sniff of everybody's favourite festive scents!
@dollyjorgensen @markstoneman @histodons @[email protected] I also think it's rather odd to say that 'class and historical inequalities now structure the way in which people are listening – or sleeping – alongside whatever I have to say' on Zoom. Does this imply Green thinks that class and other inequalities didn't structure who could or couldn't access lectures in person (and who have or have not given lectures; or how people interact/ed with the utopian lecture space he describes)? Seems bit naive...