(1/) My new book 'Smell and the Past: Noses, Archives, Narratives' isn't out in hardback until May but the open access ebook has now been published online! https://bloomsburycollections.com/book/smell-and-the-past-noses-archives-narratives/ so please download, share, and read! It's part of my work on
the Odeuropa project and its open access publication was funded by our EU Horizon 2020 grant. It's split into three parts, as the title suggests: noses, archives, narratives. #sensorystudies #sensoryhistory #smellhistory #smellstudies #bodyhist #envhist
Bloomsbury Collections - Smell and the Past - Noses, Archives, Narratives

‘What if researchers interested in ‘the past’ used their noses? This open access book makes the case for a more imaginatively interdisciplinary approach to sensory heritage and history, arguing that we can and should engage our noses as a research tool for articulating the past.’ Assessing how both we and our ancestors approach, understand and conceptualise smell, Tullett shows how archives can be ‘re-odorized’ to uncover narratives that are only implicit in or obscured by the historical record. From perfume libraries to organic compounds emitted by historical objects, this book acts as a guide for employing our olfactory senses when researching and studying history in order to understand and communicate the past more fully. Employing ‘olfactory figures’ examples, Smell and the Past shows how historical narratives and arguments can be found through a structured olfactory experience, and demonstrates how our understanding of the past and its relationship with the present

(2/) The introduction sets up a problem: sensory historians go on about how important the senses are, including smelling. But we very rarely use our noses and, in fact, some scholars have argued we shouldn't bother. I'm not convinced. The book's argument is that our understanding of the past and its relationship with the present is enriched by deploying human and more-than-human noses. One way the book does this is 'olfactory figures', where I encourage readers to 'sniff along'.
(3/) The first chapter, 'Noses' argues that using our noses as historians helps us to understand our own and past olfactory subjectivities; re-odorize our archives; engage audiences; decolonize practice and thereby ‘articulate’ the relationship between olfactory past and present.
(4/) The second chapter, 'Archives' argues that smell archives exist, can be created, and can be excavated using multidisciplinary tools. These archives are also bodily and environmental. Historical shifts and disciplinary boundaries have made smell seem more ephemeral than it is.
(5/) The third chapter, 'Narratives', is perhaps the most radical. Through a discussion of smell's complex temporalities it argues that we can create historical publications and narratives in the form of odours rather than just texts. This means going beyond linear narratives. The final chapter ends on a call for scholars: A critical smell studies starts at the tip of the nose. So let’s follow it!
(6/) The book is draws on a rich array of work from a range of scholars across the globe who work on smell. So please read the book alongside all this fantastic literature. You can find a constantly updated bibliography of interdisciplinary work here: https://zotero.org/groups/4530561/pastscent/library
Zotero | Your personal research assistant