@PH4NTXMOFFICIAL @dexternemrod Well, the light version does not seem to be FOSS either... ;)
https://github.com/PH4NTXMOFFICIAL/PH4NTXM-LITE/blob/main/LICENSE

But happy building.

@dexternemrod @PH4NTXMOFFICIAL I was also thinking to mention this because I also had the impression that their entire business model resides mostly in the work of others.

Moreover, proprietary trust-based software does not suit its purpose.

Honestly, if anyone needs an OS "to be safe in hostile environments", one IMHO must choose FOSS and best a solution which is around for some time too.

I personaly would always choose QubesOS, Whonix or Tails (or a combination of them) in such a scenario.

@PH4NTXMOFFICIAL Thanks, but this is basically a list of default configurations without any context on how this is implemented.

This is basically my point. No source code and no documentation results for me in a trust based product.

Not sure if it is wise rely on trust in a "hostile environment". I think this is in the contrary a very bad idea.

But just my 2 cent. :)

@PH4NTXMOFFICIAL
Furthermore, it seems all the pieces you use for
PH4NTXM are taken from FOSS projects e.g. Debain, Tor etc.

Can you please highlight your own developments?

Finally, if your focus group is "not for everybody" which I translate into "advanced user", wouldn't be QubesOS not a better choice?

@PH4NTXMOFFICIAL You highlight main differences to Tails/Whonix in regards to "long-term stability, continuous updates, and a controlled threat environment, which allows us to maintain system integrity".

At the end of the day base system of those is like yours Debian. So why do you think you are better then those?

Additionally, Tails and Whonix excel at security as well e.g. Whonix is even build on the Kicksecure research project...