Principles for a Human-Rights Centred Application of the DSA: A Global Perspective From the DSA Human Rights Alliance

The EU’s pioneering Digital Services Act (DSA) aims to foster a safer digital space by setting out new responsibilities for online platforms, supporting online expression, and giving users more control over their online experience in the EU. The DSA places emphasis on transparency and accountability in platform processes and requires large platforms to address risks arising from their services, including risks to fundamental rights.Many DSA provisions, including those on content moderation, trusted flaggers, liability for user-generated content and data access, have ramifications beyond the EU and are influencing digital governance debates and legislations that are being considered in other regions.As the DSA moves from legislation to enforcement, the Act’s effectiveness and impact on users will largely depend on how it is applied in practice. The DSA Human Rights Alliance, a global coalition of civil society organisations, researchers, and human rights advocates representing diverse communities across the globe, believes it is imperative for the EU to follow a globally-aware and human rights-based approach to platform governance. This includes integrating a wide range of voices and perspectives to contextualise DSA enforcement and carefully considering its global influence—the “Brussels Effect”—as  the provisions of the DSA filter into legislation in other regions.While some provisions in the Act support fundamental rights protections, other provisions are ambiguous, opening the door to abuse and politicized enforcement that could threaten the very rights the Act should protect. This calls for an inclusive and cautious approach, especially in cross-border situations and when considering the DSA for local regulatory frameworks. It also underscores the need for transparency and meaningful inclusion in ongoing policy dialogues and DSA enforcement to ensure the protection of human rights is central throughout implementation.To that end, the Alliance urges adoption of the following principles:Integrate global perspectives into a human rights-centred implementation of the DSAEmpower EU and non-EU civil society and users to pursue DSA enforcement actionsConsider extraterritorial and cross-border effects of DSA enforcementPromote cross-regional collaboration among civil society organisations on global regulatory issuesEstablish institutionalised dialogues between EU and non-EU stakeholdersUphold the rule of law and fundamental rights in DSA enforcement, free from political influenceConsider global experiences with trusted flaggers and avoid enforcement abuseRecognise the international relevance of DSA data access and transparency provisions for human rights monitoringThe Alliance's full statement and details about the principles are here:  

EU's New Digital Package Proposal Promises Red Tape Cuts but Guts GDPR Privacy Rights

The European Commission (EC) is considering a “Digital Omnibus” package that would substantially rewrite EU privacy law, particularly the landmark General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). It’s not a done deal, and it shouldn’t be.The GDPR is the most comprehensive model for privacy legislation...

After Years of Controversy, the EU’s Chat Control Nears Its Final Hurdle: What to Know

After a years-long battle, the European Commission’s “Chat Control” plan, which would mandate mass scanning and other encryption-breaking measures, at last codifies agreement on a position within the Council of the EU, representing EU States. The good news is that the most controversial part, the forced requirement to scan encrypted messages, is out. The bad news is there’s more to it than that.

J.D. Vance, Elon Musk, and MAGA’s new obsession with European regulation

The opposition to Europe’s tech laws is a symptom of Silicon Valley’s oversized influence in the White House.

EUpolicy.social - A Mastodon server for the EU bubble

Government expands police use of live facial recognition vans

The Home Office says the technology helps locate suspects but civil liberties groups warn of heightened surveillance.