Moonraker has a similar scene.

I mean, say what you want about the tenets of dry white toast eating, Dude. But at least it’s an ethos.

Jepson’s Malört. Famously bitter. I think it’s nice, but it’s often served on a dare in bars in the Chicago area.

Backup option would be straight Campari. He will need to be ok with probably dying his mouth red when he takes a sip. Mix 1:1 with some Fernet Branca to add some menthol and bitter herb flavors.

If he finds bitter flavors tasty then idk.

OPNsense and pfSense are pretty popular and are BSD-based.

Nice. I’m aiming to go from bare metal to rootless podman managed via quadlets. Networking seems like the difficult part.

The router you need depends on your connection bandwidth and whether it uses pppoe. Also what worth considering: Do you want the router to host any VPN tunnels? Do you want some headroom for the future?

The hEX Refresh test results show that it could handle maybe 600 to maybe 800Mbps, depending on the traffic and configuration (looking at somewhere between the 512 and 1518 byte result for mixed traffic routing). It will do less with pppoe overhead. And less still if it’s hosting one end of a tunnel. But the price is good. Honestly I don’t think it would be overkill for most connections.

For me I would probably also consider the hAP ax S at this performance level. A little bit more money, but with wifi.

If you want more performance the hAP ax2 is the next step up for not much more money. It will handle gigabit fiber without a problem and also has wifi. But unlike the other two it has no USB port, so you won’t be able to expand the storage, if that is important to you.

I was going to recommend a couple of Mikrotik 5Ghz bridge devices, but for the same money this would probably be easier to set up.

I don’t understand why Mikrotik doesn’t make a 5Ghz Wireless Wire kit. Their 60Ghz WW is great, and already paired like this TP-Link kit. But 60Ghz is so sensitive to line of sight interference.

Right - the water has inertia in a straight line (as does the bucket). When they both try to go straight the string prevents it, accelerating them in a new direction. At each moment you look at the circular path the water’s inertia wants to go in a straight line (tangent to the circle). So at each instant it is behaving exactly as if you had been running in a straight line and stopped.

What I meant about the geometry and axial tilt - imagine that instead of a bucket you had a dinner plate with a bucket handle. So the water was all at the level of the top of the bucket rim on a plate. As soon as you stopped the plate would flip and the water would splash off.
Likewise, if you had the string connected only to the bottom edges of the bucket rather than its handle, as soon as you stopped the bucket would flip due to the water’s strong inertial force against the side of the bucket. The setup doesn’t tilt the bucket in the right way to keep the water contained and impart the new acceleration upon it.

Think of the inertia of a bucket of water on a string that you are holding by the string.

If you are standing still the water and bucket and string behave like you expect.

Start running suddenly and the bucket will seem to swing back behind you. Your frame of reference is in motion. But when I watch you do this I see a bucket and water at rest. Their inertia resists the sudden acceleration.

As you pull the string along in your run, the swinging will stop. And with no acceleration (you are in a constant running velocity) the bucket will hang straight down again. The bucket and water are in your moving frame of reference. Their inertia is clear.

What if you stop?

Just like when you started running the inertia of the bucket and water will cause them to continue moving, swinging up. Their inertia is linear, but show up as an arc due to the string you’re holding when you accelerate to a stop. The water stays in the bucket because it’s geometry tilts its axis, keeping the bottom pointing in the direction of the watet’s inertia.

If you were carrying the water on a spoon in the same conditions the water would spill. Because it doesn’t tilt the right way to hold it in.

If, at that moment of stopping, you started swinging your arm in a circle you could create a circling bucket from your question. Sometimes the bucket will be upside down, but with sufficient acceleration the water will stay in.

It’s the inertia doing the trick. Aided by the geometry of the bucket.

That was my first thought. You can only look at one page at a time, right?

Like, if all ebook readers had this form factor, I would pay extra for a single page reader (the current form).