Tony Macklin

@tonymacklin1
11 Followers
22 Following
71 Posts

Philanthropy advisor, philanthropist, philanthropy geek. Works @ intersection of meaningful giving & community results. Mixes established practices w/emerging trends. Also senior consultant with National Center for Family Philanthropy and Ekstrom Alley Clontz & Associates.

#philanthropy #socialimpact #advising #impactinvesting #donoradvisedfunds #foundations

Websitehttps://tonymacklin.com/
LinkedInhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/tonymacklin1/
HR 9495, which would let a Trump-appointed treasury secretary strip a #nonprofit of its status if unilaterally deemed a “terrorism-supporting” organization, passed the US House today. We have the story: https://nonprofitquarterly.org/hr-9495-bill-threatening-nonprofits-passes-house/
HR 9495: Bill Threatening Nonprofits Passes House - Non Profit News | Nonprofit Quarterly

A bill, HR 9495, which would allow a presidentially appointed treasury secretary to unilaterally strip a nonprofit of its status if deemed a “terrorism-supporting” organization, has passed in the US House of Representatives.

Non Profit News | Nonprofit Quarterly
New VP candidate JD Vance has touted new regulations for #philanthropy. One example from 2021 https://www.newsweek.com/stop-treating-left-wing-advocacy-groups-like-charities-opinion-1637733
Stop Treating Left-Wing Advocacy Groups Like Charities

Our laws should promote organizations that serve our society, and reduce the power of those that harm it.

Newsweek
Reining in America’s $3.3 Trillion Tax-Exempt Economy

For over a century, lawmakers have exempted politically favored organizations and industries from the tax code. As a result, the tax-exempt nonprofit economy now comprises 15 percent of GDP, roughly equal to the fifth-largest economy in the world.

Tax Foundation

https://apnews.com/article/donor-advised-fund-irs-hearing-2a3b282a07892c9c74f00dcee4ad6f83

The $230 billion donor-advised fund industry gets an IRS hearing

The $230 billion donor-advised fund industry gets an IRS hearing

Congress and the Biden administration are considering what, if anything, should be done to tighten restrictions on donor-advised funds, an increasingly popular way for donors to set aside money to spend on charitable causes. This week, the Internal Revenue Service held a public hearing to discuss plans to regulate DAFs. The proposals include: altering the definition of what constitutes a DAF so it applies to a broader swath of accounts; expanding the definition of donor advisers to include personal investment advisers who help manage assets in DAFs; and imposing new penalties for abusing the funds. If approved, the IRS would impose a 20% excise tax on donations that provide significant benefit to the donor, among other changes.

AP News

Around $11 million spent 2018-23 on congressional #lobbying related to #donoradvisedfunds, mostly lobbying against changing the status quo.

Chronicle of Philanthropy article (paywall, interviews both sides of the reform conversation): https://www.philanthropy.com/article/philanthropy-spent-11-million-to-prevent-changes-to-daf-rules

Institute for Policy Studies report (IPS advocates for law and regulatory changes in DAFs): https://ips-dc.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Policy-Report-Who-Is-Lobbying-Against-Charity-Reform-4-5-final.pdf

160+ Philanthropists Are Demanding Charity Law Reform - Worth

Progressive campaign Donor Revolt pushes for legislation to make private foundations and donor-advised funds pay out more money, more quickly.

Worth

The Institute for Policy Studies analyzed 1,401 #donoradvisedfunds sponsors, creating a parallel data set to NPT's annual report. Different from NPT, the Institute separated from the group of national DAF sponsors 9 DAFs that serve as workplace giving sponsors or donation processors.

https://inequality.org/great-divide/daf-sponsor-numbers/

National Donor-Advised Funds Are Hiding Behind Donation Processors to Make Themselves Look Better - Inequality.org

Some donor-advised fund sponsors claim to democratize giving. They are making themselves look more egalitarian than they actually are.

Inequality.org