They're not dire wolves. But they're wolves. And they're dire: Trump's Secretary of the Interior has already claimed these new fake dire wolves mean we don't need to protect endangered species!
If you follow me I bet you follow a lot of other science news, so you probably know the supposed 'de-extinction' of dire wolves is not real. But it's still fun to hear @rebeccawatson talk about it. Take a listen.
The dire wolf was not a close relative of modern wolves: it split off from other dog-like animals in North America about 5.7 million years ago. Folks at the company Colossus used CRISPR to alter 14 genes of a wolf to give it some traits of a dire wolf: a stronger jaw muscle, lighter color, larger size, etc. But the resulting pups are not dire wolves.
Colossus claims dire wolf DNA is 99.5% identical to that of gray wolves. But that would be a difference of about 95 genes – plus a vast amount of non-coding DNA that, we now know, actually makes a difference. Furthermore there are epigenetic differences that we have no way to recreate. The new pups will never learn how to be a dire wolf from their mother. And the environment is different – so they will never hunt western horses, dwarf pronghorn, ground sloths, ancient bison, and camels the way actual dire wolves did.
Like @rebeccawatson says, we should be putting energy into saving endangered species, protecting and restoring native habitats, and stuff like that. There are people doing that – and *that* is actually very exciting. Even to grownups.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWs55JOS-fg