Unreasonably into rabbitholes. Software engineer.
Open to remote work in the EU!
| Blog | https://tsev.dev |
| https://www.linkedin.com/in/timseverien/ |
Unreasonably into rabbitholes. Software engineer.
Open to remote work in the EU!
| Blog | https://tsev.dev |
| https://www.linkedin.com/in/timseverien/ |
I got a cold recruiting email from someoneโs OpenClaw โagentโ, and I donโt know if Iโm supposed to appreciate that it clearly identified itself as such, but Iโm definitely extra annoyed.
This next level โDear {first_name}โ waste of time can fuck right off.
Whilst LLMs are marketed to be perceived as intelligent, knowledgeable, helpful, and insightful, they're also commercial products that need to retain customers.
It's only logical that LLMs are extremely conflict averse and agreeable, even when we're wrong. Is that truly helpful and insightful? It reminds me of autocratic leaders where subordinates become agreeable pawns.
Maybe we shouldn't be autocratic leaders and put pesky humans in the loop.
@hdv This is nice and all, but where is the merch? I need this on a t-shirt to thwart NPC posing as colleagues!
Jokes aside, this is good stuff! I am curious: how come the benefits section structured into subsections, and the risk section is not?
@Anneke You happen to name things where we want to be consistent, deterministic, and (somewhat) transparent instead of being opaque and do wildly different things based on a randomly assigned seed or the tone of voice of your prompt ๐
The closest thing I've seen to what you're describing is GitHub's Agentic Workflows, which allows you to schedule an agent to complete a prompt. Could be interesting to update dependencies (and follow upgrade guides), for example.