11 Followers
87 Following
44 Posts
Does, like, infosec and compliance stuff you know

Sure. Let’s do another ai driven proof of concept the sales people can run wild with and overpromise on without actually doing any market fit testing, causing the board to Hail Mary the end of year results on yet another unsecured, non-viable llm based fever dream that will cost us more than it will make.

Can we just not do it on prod this time?

I want to get of Mr bones wild ride.

Unsure whether the “ai will write most code” thing currently going on at work is a sign of the investment fund drinking the koolaid or whether it’s an indictment of most of our devs.

Kinda split on that one tbh

🚨 Ice update - #Arctic sea ice extent is currently the *lowest* on record for the date (JAXA data)...

• about 640,000 km² below the 2010s mean
• about 1,050,000 km² below the 2000s mean
• about 1,460,000 km² below the 1990s mean
• about 1,950,000 km² below the 1980s mean

More: https://zacklabe.com/arctic-sea-ice-figures/

RE: https://mstdn.ca/@AlisonCreekside/116171477122428233

Watch the Dutch government offer "political but not military" support again. Then we find out we actually did send troops years later and the fucker responsible gets elected nato chief again and we all pretend like that never happened.

Internal security friends.
If the board or the investors hire a consulting firm to analyze your orgs infosec program, despite you having informed them of what's wrong for years and them not doing shit about it, smile at the junior consultant that leads the inquiry, tell them in all honesty how much of a dumpster fire your program is, preferably with nice color coded graphs and but without blaming anybody, then use the resulting report to get what you need.
C-level inquired whether we have any controls in place to prevent open source dependencies from being used in our software. Answering that literally our entire stack is open source... was not the answer he wanted to hear. Lol.