🚨Today #Google increases prices by ~20% 🚨

❤️ While we offer 50% discount. ❤️

✅ Check out Tuta Mail & Tuta Calendar: http://tuta.com/goeuropean

The irony is that dev teams who work in ways that appear to get the best results from LLMs - small steps, prompting with tests, rapid feedback loops, continuous testing, code review and integration, and good separation of concerns - have little need for the tools.

They're like healing crystals that work if you get a good night's sleep, drink plenty of water, eat a healthy balanced diet and run 5 km a day.

xAI updated Grok to be anti-woke and it’s started calling itself “MechaHitler.”

No better summary of the worldview of people who describe themselves as anti-woke. Even AI figured that out.

At this point, it really does look like the key to keeping LLMs on the rails in your dev workflow is:

* Small feedback cycles, solving one problem at a time
* Prompting with test cases/usage examples
* Continuous testing
* Continuous code review & refactoring
* Continuous integration
* Effective separation of concerns in the design

LOL.

What you've got here is essentially the engineering practices of Extreme Programming.

It could even be argued this is a statistical case for their efficacy.