0 Followers
0 Following
3 Posts
I assume there’s a better example to make your point because at least here you’re explicitly stating ricin is used for poison, an objectively good thing to know.
Scream: interviewer is no Sharon Stone
You don’t have to make it simple, but it would have been nice if you provided some kind of evidence instead of half a post worth of condenscension. Like, I get that these things can be emotional, but you’re just being mean instead of informative.
Can you help me understand how using the browser is directly funding those things?
AI Poe’s Law?

He’s chosen Anthropic which is complicit in a war, whose AI is being used by the military to further military interests. Out of many more ethical models out there, why go with that one specifically?

In case this isn’t a rhetorical question, Claude is considered to be leading the pack for developer functionality. I can’t comment on the overall decision process, but it’s clear that lots of people a) don’t think about ethical concerns b) don’t prioritize them in decisions or c) align.

All we can really do is ask that people consider these things.

can we at least try to use critical reading on lemmy

OP was clearly using a rhetorical reduction to make a point that VS is bloated.

salt life shirt in ohio is wild

~i assume they exist~

far superior version.

thems fightin words