Tony BarkMar 12

Lutris now being built with Claude AI, developer decides to hide it after backlash

https://pawb.social/post/41039903

Lutris now being built with Claude AI, developer decides to hide it after backlash - Pawb.Social

> A user asked on the official Lutris GitHub two weeks ago “is lutris slop now” and noted an increasing amount of “LLM generated commits”. To which the Lutris creator replied: > > It’s only slop if you don’t know what you’re doing and/or are using low quality tools. But I have over 30 years of programming experience and use the best tool currently available. It was tremendously helpful in helping me catch up with everything I wasn’t able to do last year because of health issues / depression. > > > > There are massive issues with AI tech, but those are caused by our current capitalist culture, not the tools themselves. In many ways, it couldn’t have been implemented in a worse way but it was AI that bought all the RAM, it was OpenAI. It was not AI that stole copyrighted content, it was Facebook. It wasn’t AI that laid off thousands of employees, it’s deluded executives who don’t understand that this tool is an augmentation, not a replacement for humans. > > > > I’m not a big fan of having to pay a monthly sub to Anthropic, I don’t like depending on cloud services. But a few months ago (and I was pretty much at my lowest back then, barely able to do anything), I realized that this stuff was starting to do a competent job and was very valuable. And at least I’m not paying Google, Facebook, OpenAI or some company that cooperates with the US army. > > > > Anyway, I was suspecting that this “issue” might come up so I’ve removed the Claude co-authorship from the commits a few days ago. So good luck figuring out what’s generated and what is not. Whether or not I use Claude is not going to change society, this requires changes at a deeper level, and we all know that nothing is going to improve with the current US administration.

Show threadr1veRRRMar 13

From his perspective, he’s investing his free time and likely money into a project for people that are 99% of the time just leechers, as in they never contribute back and only complain.

Now he has a tool that he feels helps him deal with all that FREE labor is doing for everyone, and the very same people now want to tell him how to do his FREE labor he does for them.

I completely understand being pissed off by that.

Show threadqaetaMar 13
I mean, a reasonable person would choose to stop rather than becoming an unethical egotistical fuckwit…
Show threadkungenMar 13

A reasonable person would have forked the repo and maintained the project themselves, or used something else. I’m also deathly allergic to LLM code, but I don’t come into someone else’s free project and tell them how they should live their life.

But I agree that it was bad style to remove the co-author attribute. He should have just said “yeah, I slop, so what?”

Show threadmeowkiMar 13

FOSS projects are built on trust. The developer removing the co-author attribute due to backlash followed by seemingly taunting people by telling them good luck to identify which is LLM code and which is human code is just plain bad behavior.

Own what you do. Be transparent with the community. The backlash isn’t going to kill you. But you dig yourself a deeper grave by openly admitting to obfuscate the development process of a FOSS project.

My personal issue is his choice of the model used. He’s chosen Anthropic which is complicit in a war, whose AI is being used by the military to further military interests. Out of many more ethical models out there, why go with that one specifically?

Show threadshynoise

He’s chosen Anthropic which is complicit in a war, whose AI is being used by the military to further military interests. Out of many more ethical models out there, why go with that one specifically?

In case this isn’t a rhetorical question, Claude is considered to be leading the pack for developer functionality. I can’t comment on the overall decision process, but it’s clear that lots of people a) don’t think about ethical concerns b) don’t prioritize them in decisions or c) align.

All we can really do is ask that people consider these things.

Mar 13 at 6:02pmWeb
Show threadAuliMar 13
I mean in Hus rant he literally said he choose an AI company that doesn’t work with the military. Which is funny. I mean they took a stance against them in the future bit they did work with them.