Isn’t it always the case when there is too much to lose? As the company gets bigger, priorities change from risk-taking to being risk-averse. https://om.co/2026/01/27/a-ceo-captured/
| Location | California |
Yury
- 124 Followers
- 389 Following
- 241 Posts
Engineer - working on network infrastructure. Curious about tech things from networking, bsd & linux to functional programming.
Funny that two out of six #ubuntu servers (ports.ubuntu.com) reply with MSS of 8960B and occasionally fail to establish connections due to broken PMTUD
“Trains were halted after a suspected AI-generated picture that seemed to show major damage to a bridge appeared on social media following an earthquake.”
Sunrise somewhere near Zurich. I was lucky enough to be in a right place at a right time to witness it.
@yakkoj maybe Juniper has a better chance of surviving together with HPE.
@lu1a the main “upgrade” comes when there is SERDES speed increase. For example, 400G can be implemented as 8x50, 4x100 and pretty soon 2x200G. The signal integrity becomes much more challenging with a speed increase per lane. On a positive side you need N times less lanes so your I/O density is increasing and you can pack more of those lanes.
@ricci from my experience it depends on a query. sometimes works great and other times it doesn’t