@seasidetesting

1 Followers
210 Following
3.1K Posts

I am a traveller (not necessarily in a geographical sense) who seeks, observes … & occasionally finds.

I am a programming software tester, studied physics, survived cancer & live at the seaside. I love the ocean and go swimming a lot.

Oh, and I'm currently (end of 2022) looking for a new software testing/Ruby project.

Languages (in no particular order): English, Ruby, German

Software Testinghttps://seasidetesting.com
ScienceOceanography & Physics
GitHubhttps://github.com/s2k/
PronounsHe/Him

Leftovers from costume production for @agileTD 2022

#agileTD

Fancy a #Ruby, #Home, or #unicorn sticker?

Find me at @[email protected] in Potsdam in just a bit more than 2 weeks.🙂

Hi, I'm Stephan & I will be in Potsdam to speak at @[email protected] 12-24 Nov. 2022. If you're there too, say hi!

You can talk to me about (winter) swimming, #oceanography, #Ruby and of course #Testing. 😃 #agileTD

With a hat tip to @[email protected].

Saturday morning swimming 🌊🏊‍♂️🌊: 10°C in the water – that's fresh. 😀🥶😅 It's also super refreshing. 😄

RT @[email protected]

10 arguments against climate change people sent me today* and 10 Global Weirding episodes I made years ago that debunk them: A fun thread

* yes, literally today.

🐦🔗: https://twitter.com/KHayhoe/status/1586793478482272257

Prof. Katharine Hayhoe on Twitter

“10 arguments against climate change people sent me today* and 10 Global Weirding episodes I made years ago that debunk them: A fun thread * yes, literally today.”

Twitter

Looks interesting. But … #cucumber for #UnitTests?
I wonder what’s the rationale for this. I see Cucumber very much as a non-unit-test tool. Am I wrong? Is it just weird?

/cc @[email protected]

RT @[email protected]

Habrá que echarle un ojo #testautomation
https://www.jetbrains.com/aqua/

🐦🔗: https://twitter.com/morvader/status/1588452203949395969

#Inktober2022, Day 29: Prompt word: #farm

A #Haubarg, a once widespread form of farm house here in Nordfriesland.
They a large buildings usually have thatched roofs.
See ➙ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haubarg

Pigma Micron 08 & 02 on paper

#Inktober

Haubarg - Wikipedia

So I looked into 'Camping' , a #Ruby 'web framework which consistently stays at less than 5kB of code.' (cited from https://github.com/camping/camping)
Its main focus is not readability. 😄
It's very _why_the_lucky_stiff, though. — And it's brilliant, for a certain value of 'brilliant'. 😃

RT @[email protected]

Drowning dinosaurs: when a big asteroid hits, the waves are global - and a mile high.
https://bit.ly/3D9u6tz (sound by 10 Echo) @[email protected]

🐦🔗: https://twitter.com/Cmdr_Hadfield/status/1585418675179630592

End-Cretaceous asteroid caused massive global tsunami, peaking at a mile high

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aJJOjWX3S1Q Animations of the post-asteroid impact tsunami at the end of the Cretaceous Period, as modeled by a new study in AGU Advances. Credit: AGU Advances AGU press contact: Rebecca Dzombak, [email protected], +1 (202) 777-7492 (UTC-4 hours) University of Michigan press contact: Jim Erickson, [email protected], +1 (734) 647-1842 (UTC-4 hours) Contact information for the researchers: Molly Range, [email protected] (UTC-4 hours) WASHINGTON — The asteroid that struck Earth and led to the Cretaceous-Paleogene (K-Pg) mass extinction 66 million years ago also triggered a worldwide tsunami that started as a wave more than a mile high, according to a new study. The tsunami was large enough to scour the ocean floor thousands of miles from the impact site on Mexico’s Yucatán Peninsula. The study, published today in AGU Advances, presents the first global simulation of the Chicxulub impact tsunami to be published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal, corroborated by an exhaustive new compilation of geologic sites that hold evidence of a massive, global tsunami. Their models indicated that open-ocean wave heights in the Gulf of Mexico would have exceeded 300 meters (984 feet) about one hour after the impact, with maximum wave heights generally decreasing with time and distance from impact. The authors calculated that the initial energy in the tsunami was up to 30,000 times larger than the energy in the December 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake tsunami, which is one of the largest tsunamis in the modern record. Based on the models, the tsunami would have dissipated in less than a week. “Any historically documented tsunamis pale in comparison with such global impact,” the authors wrote. To cross-check their models with geologic evidence, the authors examined 120 geological sites from before and after the asteroid impact and found evidence of a global tsunami, arriving as far away as what is now New Zealand. They compared those sediments to the waves and erosion predicted by their models. “This tsunami was strong enough to disturb and erode sediments in ocean basins halfway around the globe, leaving either a gap in the sedimentary records or a jumble of older sediments,” said lead author Molly Range, a physical oceanographer at the University of Michigan. “The distribution of the erosion and hiatuses that we observed in the uppermost Cretaceous marine sediments are consistent with our model results, which gives us more confidence in the model predictions.” “The geological evidence definitely strengthens the paper,” said Brian Arbic, a physical oceanographer at the University of Michigan and study co-author. Of special significance, according to the authors, are outcrops of the K-Pg boundary on the eastern shores of New Zealand’s North and South Islands, which are more than 12,000 kilometers (7,500 miles) from the Yucatán impact site. The heavily disturbed New Zealand sediments were originally thought to be the result of local tectonic activity. But given the age of the deposits and their location directly in the modeled pathway of the Chicxulub impact tsunami, the team suspected a different origin. “We feel these deposits are recording the effects of the impact tsunami, and this is perhaps the most telling confirmation of the global significance of this event,” Range said. While the study did not explicitly model coastal flooding, wave heights could have approached more than 10 meters (32.8 feet) as the tsunami neared North Atlantic coastal regions and parts of South America’s Pacific coast. North Atlantic coastal regions and parts of South America’s Pacific coast. As the tsunami neared those shorelines and encountered shallow bottom waters, wave heights would have increased dramatically through a process called shoaling. Such heights could well have caused substantial flooding, and a future study from some authors on the study will explore that process. # # # AGU (www.agu.org) supports 130,000 enthusiasts to experts worldwide in Earth and space sciences. Through broad and inclusive partnerships, we advance discovery and solution science that accelerate knowledge and create solutions that are ethical, unbiased and respectful of communities and their values. Our programs include serving as a scholarly publisher, convening virtual and in-person events and providing career support. We live our values in everything we do, such as our net zero energy renovated building in Washington, D.C. and our Ethics and Equity Center, which fosters a diverse and inclusive geoscience community to ensure responsible conduct. Notes for Journalists: Download a PDF copy of the paper here. AGU Advances is published with open access, and this study is freely available. Multimedia are available with this release, from the University of Michigan: Video Images and animations Paper title: “The Chicxulub Impact Produced a Powerful Global Tsunami” Authors: Molly M. Range (corresponding author), Theodore C. Moore, Jeroen Ritsema, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA Brian K. Arbic, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Recently on sabbatical at Institut des Géosciences de L’Environnement (IGE), Grenoble, France, and Laboratoire des Etudes en Géophysique et Océanographie Spatiale (LEGOS), Toulouse, France Brandon C. Johnson, Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA; Department of Physics and Astronomy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA Vasily Titov, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Pacific Marine Environmental Lab, Seattle, WA, USA Alistair J. Adcroft, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences Program, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA Joseph K. Ansong, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Mathematics, University of Ghana, P.O. Box LG 62, Legon, Accra, Ghana Christopher J. Hollis, School of Geography, Environment and Earth Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand Christopher R. Scotese, PALEOMAP Project, Evanston, IL, USA He Wang, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, NJ, USA; University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO, USA

AGU Newsroom