@Andres If you want a web interface I nominate Forgejo, but in my opinion, there are no nice ones. Most copy github and that has the worst possible UX in my opinion. If you "just" want a server, I vote for gitolite. Minimal dependencies, no runtime that consumes resources 24/7, no additional attack surfaces. very light weight.

@evan I've seen (and built POC) bot nets/systems controlled by nearly everything that sends/returns a payload. Could be the ICMP/ping response payload, a single stray udp packet or almost any layer 7 protocol.

@newsmast I do have an account, but I also host my own forgejo instance for my own projects (and members of my platform), Sadly you need an account on gh to collaborate with others there :( I hate GH, the UX is terrible and sadly all other system (including forgejo) copy that :( Plus the whole AI BS.without asking me. Typical MS behavior... I'd love an alternative that is actually usable by non-developers as well.

@evan synonyms might be one way, an even more flexible one would be a sort parameter. sort by date ascending or whatever is reasonable in the current list. For "chronological" collections, this is obvious, but there are others.

@pluralistic Not sure if I understand the question correctly. If you want to preserve the timestamps and such, use -a. This will fix the copy on change issue (timestamp changes on source->copy) if you don't want to rely on timestamps, use -c (slower, reads source and copy)
My personal rsync command is:
>> rsync -abzO --partial-dir=.rsync-partial --force --ignore-errors --delete --backup-dir=/backup/archive/`date +%Y-%m-%d` source/dir /backup/snapshot/<<<

@ErikUden I gave it a try. I could clearly isolate the voices, but was not able to filter out the song voice since it's too loud and in the same frequency range as your voice. If you want the isolated track, send me a message here or on matrix.

@echo_pbreyer Die Sicherheit im Internet wird doch gewahrt, es werden nur die Bösen überwacht. Ganz bestimmt, versprochen. Nein, unsere Bundsregierung (Schreibfehler beabsichtigt) treibt das doch an. "Wir dürfen nicht blind werden und brauchen mehr <Überwachungsfantasie einfügen>". Leider ist das Parteibuch doch inzwischen fast egal, fast alle die was zu sagen haben sind dafür, jedenfalls bis sie selbst mal überwacht werden, obwohl sie überwacht werden sollten *hust* Flinten-Uschi's SMS.

@evan I'd vote for store on user's device as much as possible. If it is not possible, try to store it on servers encrypted, but sometimes you need to have it accessible for others and indirectly for the horders.People just need to remember: public is public for everyone for basically everything. Yes there are laws and ways to manage your intend, but as long as it's enforced only on the client, no chance to control it.

@evan I know, I'm too late. But it really depends. If you take ActivityPub ( I think you heard about that ;) ), you have to store most of it on the server, if you take bookmarks, these are/should be client only. If you want to store stuff cross browser->server storage. login data/passkeys local unless you use a web based password manager (self hosted of course). So a definite "it depends" as answer ;)

@evan I had issues during testing of my TOTP integration. Turned out my phone and my development computer had a time drift of about 50s. Not enough to notice, but large enough to not work anymore. So I would vote for 10s or less which is included in the 1 minute ;)