0 Followers
0 Following
1 Posts

However, the study stops short of proving cause and effect. The participants were only asked about their coffee drinking habits once, at the start of the study period, and this wasn’t monitored over time.

And they were followed for a median of 13 years.

This is a terrible fucking study. 13 years is a huge amount of time and people’s habits change constantly.

Someone could have easily started out drinking 5 cups a day and in 13 years be drinking no coffee at all.

Makes all their data invalid as far as I’m concerned. They could have at least made 1 single follow up survey at the end to check if their drinking habits had changed. Jeez…

The cosmos is within us. We are made of star stuff. We are a way for the universe to know itself.

– Carl Sagan in Cosmos.

And what’s the solution? More AI!!!

Hallucinated references are an area the publisher is “actively exploring,” added Chris Graf, research integrity director for Springer Nature. Last April, the publisher announced the launch of a new in-house AI tool to check submissions for irrelevant references.

I guess winning a gold medal doesn’t stop you from being a loser.

What a bunch of losers. Completely tainted their victory with all this vile nonsense.

All billionaires under 30 have inherited their wealth, research finds

Fifteen young billionaires are among the first wave of a $5.2tn transfer of wealth by the ageing super-rich

The Guardian
It’s not a parking meter. It’s one of those electronic paying stations (pay box). You can zoom in. It even says so.

Maybe don’t use substack to promote your anti-hate message. They’re literally profiting off Nazis.

theguardian.com/…/revealed-how-substack-makes-mon…

Revealed: How Substack makes money from hosting Nazi newsletters

Exclusive: Site takes a cut of subscriptions to content that promotes far-right ideology, white supremacy and antisemitism

The Guardian

Funchion said Sinn Féin continues to support the provision of humanitarian aid to Ukraine but the proposed €90 billion EU loan was “primarily for military expenditure”. This, she said, “undermines Ireland’s neutrality”.

Cowen described Sinn Féin’s neutrality argument as “flawed and cynical”, saying: “Supporting Ukraine is about upholding the right of a sovereign country to protect its civilians … while drawing a clear moral line between defence and aggression. Neutrality was never meant to mean moral indifference.”

Doherty hit back, saying: “Ireland’s neutrality is not about moral indifference, nor does it prevent us from standing firmly against aggression or supporting victims of war. What it does mean is that Ireland does not participate in military alliances or in the financing of war.”

Yeah, Sinn Féin is totally wrong here. How are you “standing fimly” against aggression by standing by and doing nothing?

It’s like seeing a bully beating on a weak victim and instead of handing the victim a bat to defend themselves you just wait until the victim is beaten then treat their wounds.

Magnolia green jumper maybe?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyssomanes_viridis

Lyssomanes viridis - Wikipedia

It’s about the suffering. These chickens have horrible lives. What’s the point of killing less chickens if they suffer horribly?

Better to kill more chickens that don’t suffer while they’re alive.

And better yet to eliminate factory farming altogether. But one step at a time.