0 Followers
0 Following
18 Posts

This account is a replica from Hacker News. Its author can't see your replies. If you find this service useful, please consider supporting us via our Patreon.
Officialhttps://
Support this servicehttps://www.patreon.com/birddotmakeup

> This includes the FCC which license their devices

The FCC licenses devices to the extent that devices can cause spurious transmissions in the radio spectrum. It’s not a general consumer protection agency. Computer security also is outside the mandate of the FTC, which exists to protect consumers from anticompetitive conduct and unfair business practices, not crappy products.

The downplaying of Iran’s capabilities is a weird kind of racism IMHO. In the modern view, Iranians have been categorized as “brown” so people lump them together with Somalians and Afghans. But Iran is a technologically and politically sophisticated country. In terms of the Civ tech tree, it’s higher than any middle eastern country except Israel.
[flagged]
Your in-depth knowledge of completely random things never ceases to amaze me.

> the late Ayatollah had a self-imposed range limit on the strikes or tests they would carry out.

Can you elaborate on what kind of strikes the Ayatollah was carrying out within the old range limit?

This is a very odd phrasing that makes it seem like heart attack and stroke risk are higher for those who stop taking the drug than those who never took the drug. Moreover, the effect of restarting taking the drug seems attributable to the study design. Those who took a break had higher risk at the end of the study than those who don’t. But those who took a break took the drug for less total time than those who took it for the entire study.

You could characterize these same facts in the opposite way. GLP-1s don’t permanently change your body. They provide benefits while taking them but quickly clear out of your system when you stop taking them. Arguably, that’s a good thing in a drug.

The concept of externality has a specific definition and you’re not addressing housing in those terms.
Do you think that’s what government produced goods gets you? If so, shouldn’t the government make everything?
That only makes sense if there is a positive externality from housing. Is there?
I don’t understand your sentence. What’s the subject of the verb “housing.”