Mark Seemann

@ploeh
437 Followers
4 Following
529 Posts
Danish software design
Websitehttps://blog.ploeh.dk

Coming off a successful undertaking, I have time for new endeavours. Potentially full time until end of August, and perhaps a few months more. Part-time with no definite end.

I may be particularly interested in improving legacy code. https://blog.ploeh.dk/hire-me

Hire Me

Would you like help with software design, TDD, code review, process, or programming? If so, I may be able to assist.

Are you using LLMs to generate so much code that reviews or other forms of quality assurance have become a bottleneck?

I may be able to help. https://blog.ploeh.dk/hire-me

Hire Me

Would you like help with software design, TDD, code review, process, or programming? If so, I may be able to assist.

Revenge of The Business Idiot

If you liked this piece, you should subscribe to my premium newsletter. It’s $70 a year, or $7 a month, and in return you get a weekly newsletter that’s usually anywhere from 5,000 to 18,000 words, including vast, detailed analyses of NVIDIA, Anthropic and OpenAI’s

Ed Zitron's Where's Your Ed At

I recently came across a quote that I forgot to bookmark. Does anyone recognise it?

It went something like this:

The people who find LLMs most useful for writing are people who don’t like to write. The people who find them most useful for programming are people who don’t like programming. They are constantly shouting about their productivity because they want validation from the people who actually enjoy the craft.

As impressive and occasionally useful as LLMs are, the hype means that I'm regularly disappointed when I try to get it to do something useful.

Latest example: I want some LLM to summarise a podcast episode. I can even provide a transcript. So far, no such luck. Suggestions?

Recently, I've been feeding LLMs photos of hand-drawn diagrams, asking them to turn them into TikZ drawings.

This seems to be at the frontier of what LLMs can do. It's not an entire fiasco, but on the other hand not going particularly well, either.

Motivated reasoning

Most of my concerns about AI are probably irrelevant, but what if one of them is not?

@ploeh something I haven’t seen discussed much is that software itself is the purest form of bureaucracy. It’s a system of rules which makes decisions at high speeds, usually without room for human judgement during the process. You bring up trello boards as a form of bureaucracy and it makes me think of a previous job where they enforced via Jira automations that tickets could only move between states following a specific graph, much to everyone’s hatred. Bureaucracy at its core (IMO) is about replacing human subjectivity with inhuman logic, and programmers swim in this stuff. I don’t think most of them realize that this is what they’re doing to themselves and the world, though.
New article: In defence of bureaucracy. https://blog.ploeh.dk/2026/04/20/in-defence-of-bureaucracy
In defence of bureaucracy

Objectivity, meritocracy, high bus factor. What's not to like?

Secret agentic AI

A scenario.