@[email protected] me 2

but some companies are too attached to their code  

@Scorpion8741 @trafotin @librewolf

Thanks for the article..

https://github.com/mullvad/mullvad-browser/issues/1#issuecomment-1495998714

@Scorpion8741 @trafotin @librewolf for how long you're going to use #arkenfox and the main dev said they'll retire it because Mullvad browser exists now, and it has way better approach to browser fingerprinting resistance ( this proves my point : forks do matter )

Librewolf will have to work on their own configuration to debloat Firefox once that happens, and in my opinion trust doesn't count much as an argument because everything is done in the open ( FLOSS ), I never heard Trafotin uses this argument ( and he shouldn't ) because he writes configuration scripts and so he's a third party !!

so you see this argument isn't always valid

if it was about trust, than I do trust the devs who are doing more to protect the user privacy and security than those who don't, but the first rule is it has to be done in the open.

@isgleas @uselessauth

Crypto doesn't solve a problem, it prevents a problem from happening ( banking surveillance )

@Scorpion8741 @trafotin also, forks are there for a reason, if you want an un-mozillied browser these forks are your best bet, also they get fast updates especially @librewolf because they take security seriously

I don't wanna go as far as saying : Firefox is a spyware, but I heard many people label it as such, because of the telemetry and that token

moreover, Palemoon uses a different render engine I believe so it's more of a competitor, not a fork, and it can be more secure than other browsers, I remember once FF got a vulnerability while Palemoon didn't get affected by it, remember vulnerabilities maybe discovered too late