As for will Scotland thrive? There are many smaller economies in the EU, & the EU is the far better/democratic union.
And surely, we can discount to some degree the risks and fears? Westminster propaganda is so active in this space, we can't give full value to such fears. Of course there are challenges, but surely not to invalidate Scotland's independence.
End/
...as we know with the brexit ref, politicians encouraging turnout/significance isn't really so important.
But regardless, what is a 'generation'? This surely is key. We may think of it as longer than 8-10 years, but the only definition in a UK legal govt doc is actually 8 years I believe.
So, we're there?
Any other factors?
How about the key decision points back in 2014?
No 1, I think, was EU membership. After #Brexit, does that not make a shorter gap completely defensible?
2/
James O'Brien applauds Tory MP Tim Loughton's questioning of Suella Braverman which exposed the UK's lack of legal routes for asylum seekers.
'Thank you for reminding us what decent politics looks like.'
Scottish government can't hold an IndyRef without UK Govt consent.
Imagine if Brexiters were told that the UK couldn't hold a Brexit Referendum without EU's consent.
They'd be apoplectic.
But today they are cheering for 'The Union' and the enforced membership of Scotland against their wishes.