Lots of booths at the Common at No Kings, now is a great time to get involved
- 0 Followers
- 0 Following
- 1 Posts
Ah, according to Anthropic. Yep, straight into the toilet with the rest of the slop.
I was just thinking that the one thing the race to the bottom has not yet replaced with a cheaper, enshittified version is death. Love, friendship, food, urbanization, yes.
Quoting directly from Schrödinger’s diaries, Moore revealed that the physicist justified his attraction to girls by considering that, being a genius (which he believed no woman ever could be), he was naturally entitled. “It seems to be the usual thing that men of strong, genuine intellectuality are immensely attracted only by women who, forming the very beginning of the intellectual series, are as nearly connected to the preferred springs of nature as they themselves. Nothing intermediate will do, since no woman will ever approach nearer to genius by intellectual education than some unintellectuals do by birth so to speak.”
TIL. Ugh.
One of my favorite arcs.
Generally seems like the right message, but there are plenty of third factors that might be a more direct cause — amount of drugs, microplastics, pesticides, etc in the environment / food.
Big crowds and lots of booths & petitions in Boston.
Yeah, I wish git blame could highlight the lines written by Claude/Codex. Usually when I ask my colleagues ‘so did you use AI much for this one’ they will say yes. But it makes code review that much harder, especially when they then take my PR comments and feed them to the LLM, so I’m coding by playing telephone with a bot.
This may be referencing a chart from CNN’s report on Small Arms Survey data, which includes many other statistics making the same point. Here’s another:
Who works at a (tech) company that's not delirious about AI?
Who works at a (tech) company that's not delirious about AI? - Lemmy.World
I see a lot of discussion here about over-hyped AI, and then I see the huge AI bubble at my workplace, in news, in PR statements, etc. Are there folks who work at companies – especially interested in those in tech – that have a reasonable handle on AI’s practical uses and its limitations? Where I work, there’s: - a dashboard of AI usage by team and individual, which will definitely not affect performance review in any way - a mandate to use one AI tool last month, and this month a new one to abandon that tool and adopt a different one - quarterly goals where almost every one has some amount of “with AI” in it - letters from the CEO asking which teams are using AI to implement features from ticket descriptions, or (inspired by the news) use flocks of agents, asking for positives without mention of asking for negatives - a team creating a review pipeline for AI-generated output in our product, planning to review the quality of the output… using AI - teammates are writing code and designs and sending them for review without ensuring functionality or pruning irrelevant portions, despite a statement that everyone is responsible for reviewing AI output Is all the resistance to overuse of AI grassroots and is the pressure for rampant adoption uniform among executives/investors? Or are some companies or verticals not drinking the koolaid?