38 Followers
135 Following
78 Posts
meh

I want to explain a few things and then it might be clearer why UK trans people are upset.

In 2001 I married my wife, Sylvia.

In 2005 I started medical transition. For the state to recognise this I had to submit to standards of "care" which were humiliating, degrading and which placed me at risk of violence.

But I did it "by the book"

As I did it "by the book", the NHS agreed to reregister me as female, which makes sense because my anatomy now is.

In 2007 I had sex reassignment surgery. This had to be signed off by two mental health professionals, "by the book", and it was.

In 2008 I applied for gender recognition. This involved signing a statutory obligation, stating that I promised, BY LAW, to live fully as female for the rest of my life. As this was done, "by the book", the government promised that it would treat me as such.

Its first act as treating me as female was to annul our marriage because it was a same sex marriage and those were not allowed.

The state then reissued my birth certificate, correcting the "mistake" it had originally made when it recorded me as male, "by the book".

In 2009 Sylvia and I married for the second time, in a same sex civil partnership, which was done "by the book", because the state regarded me as female and I was bound by law to be female.

In 2013 we married again, because the state decided that same sex marriage was in fact allowed after all. This was done, "by the book". Despite having been married for 12 years, we had to submit ourselves to individual questioning to prove our relationship was genuine, "by the book".

In April of 2025 the state turned round and told me that I had been mistaken. That it never regarded me as female. That I was male the whole time. That the marriage it annulled because it was a same sex marriage was never a same sex marriage (but it stays annulled). That the civil partnership in 2009 never really happened because "opposite sex" civil partnerships were not allowed in 2009.

And that the legal obligation I have to live as female for the rest of my life, which I signed and gave up my marriage for, is still in effect but also if I keep following it, I am breaking the law and subject to arrest. As it's still valid, presumably if I don't keep following it, I am also breaking the law and subject to arrest.

The law of the land simultaneously requires me to be both a man and a woman and if I do either then I am breaking the law and subject to arrest.

At every stage I did what the state asked me to, even though it was humiliating, degrading and cruel.

And it kept moving the goalposts, and reneging on the agreements it made, whilst continuing to hold me to them even when they are now mutually contradictory.

Apparently this is "all my fault" and I should have known that this would be the consequences of my actions when I started medical transition 2 decades ago.

Perhaps you can now appreciate why we are upset?

Apropos my previous comments about listening to yourself and taking action on your own initiative during emergencies, I wanted to offer this additional detail I came across about the flooding in Camp Mystic in Texas:

> “Are we staying or leaving?” she yelled through the window.

> “Stay in your cabin!” she recalled a staff member shouting back.

> All the girls in Giggle Box had woken up, she said, and they were terrified.

> “We need to leave,” the girls started saying. “We need to leave.”

Recall that the “she” in this quote is a teenage girl who was instructed by an adult staff member to remain in place and initially obeyed that instruction.

It was the children in her care—aged 8 to 10–who urged her to evacuate, which she initially refused.

But then she listened to them and they all evacuated and survived, just by *walking to higher ground*. The children who did not evacuate all drowned.

So I’ll say this again: listen to yourself and *listen to kids*. They are not always as bogged down as adults are by social fictions about propriety, embarrassment from overreacting, obedience to authority, etc.

Listen to kids.

https://archive.is/yfHd7

@bojerlanski Oder den RSS-Feed abonnieren 🤝
@StefanRoock Müsste es im 3. Absatz nicht Abteilungsleiter heissen statt Bereichsleiter?

@hankarus @politicalbeauty.bsky.social

Ja, einige Schweizer wollen die Gefährderin der Demokratie scheinbar loswerden..

@rainer @masek Ich vermute mal dass Correctiv genau diese Systematik rausfinden will.
Wird das Wohnen noch teurer? Unsere Crowd-Recherche zur Grundsteuerreform

Dieses Thema sorgt in ganz Deutschland für Aufregung: Ein Großteil der Kommunen verschickt derzeit die Bescheide, wie viel Steuern die Eigentümerinnen und Eigentümer von nun an für ihre Grundstücke zahlen müssen. Und die Medien sind voll von Schreckensnachrichten: Achtmal so hohe Steuerbeträge in der Münchner Innenstadt, der Berliner Kurier schreibt vom Grundsteuer-Hammer und in Hagen […]

correctiv.org

@HonkHase Du findest das an den Haaren herbei gezogen, ist dein gutes Recht.

Als der Artikel vor 2 Wochen raus kam gab es diese ersten Infos noch nicht, und daher fand ich es nicht an den Haaren herbeigezogen, über eine _mögliche_ Verbindung zu schreiben.

Was wollte ich sagen..? Äh ja, erstmal Kaffee ☕️

Actually going to pull this quote out on its own:

"While we certainly do not view the projections of an intelligence report as a blueprint for liberation, we do find it notable that even intelligence agencies determined to maintain US global dominance at any price— agencies that have historically crushed the democratic hopes of entire nations in order to maintain the current world order—can imagine a world where activists and organizers win."