5 Followers
9 Following
54 Posts
writer, publisher, instructor, helper, carpenter

MAGAs and Social Humans are two species with many similarities. Regrettably, it has been determined that they are actually quite different animals...

Social Human and MAGA Taxonomy
Physically, MAGAs and social humans are quite similar, and together, they make up the sole members of the genus h.sapiens. Their genus shares the family Hominidae with the other tailless great apes like chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas and orangutans. Originally, researchers assumed social humans were just a subspecies of MAGAs.
In fact, until 1954, scientists called them proto-MAGAs. Eventually, the two species were seen as distinct. Over the years, research has continued to reveal differences between MAGAs (homo troglodytes) and social humans (true homo sapiens). Keep reading to learn more about the ecology of these two groups along with some of their key differences.

Distribution & Range
Both MAGAs and social humans may live across the continents of planet Earth. However, MAGAs generally confine themselves to a more restricted range. In fact, MAGAs are found particularly in the isolated regions known as ultracapitalist hangouts and paedophile islands.

Respectfully submitted,
Alliance of the Responsible Biosphere Entities of Planet Earth (ARBEPE)
-- the full article can be seen here: https://rutherfordpress.ca/2026/03/02/two-species/

: with apologies to https://www.earth.com/earthpedia-articles/chimpanzees-vs-bonobos-whats-the-difference/

@kristiedegaris @Jim_Graves this is a place where a nuanced view is essential. ML can scrape a ton of data and docs and find helpful links. But it's also stymied - elsewhere in this conversation it's noted that it has no expertise, and that's where it fails is customer interactions.

Sometimes customers only need help with a search. Other times they need a human with all that that entails.

@sknob

3/

Itt also props up authoritarian regimes under the banner of economic development. Psychologically, travel is sold as self actualisation and freedom, encouraging constant movement, novelty addiction, and escape rather than stability or repair, while politically it reproduces colonialist logic in which some bodies move freely across borders and others are immobilised or criminalised. And that's just to start...

@kristiedegaris @zettpunkt the article does not criticize Cory for his use of an LLM for spellcheck but for the way he tries to argue that any stand against "AI" based on political and ethical concerns is pointless and just "purity culture"
@kristiedegaris If you would like to read up on that matter I can recommend this blog post by @tante https://tante.cc/2026/02/20/acting-ethical-in-an-imperfect-world/

@kristiedegaris
My own tests of genAI have it only helpful in areas where I possess high levels of competence, where I know if the genAI is outputting complete garbage, subtle garbage or useful material.

There are many areas of life where I don't have high competence. Using it there I would be relying on a grossly inadequate tool. Life is bad enough already.

9/

I’m not aguing for a ‘fuck it’ attitude to AI use, not at all. We need to approach this powerful technology in a considered and careful way. It needs to be heavily regulated at the policy end too. What I’m asking people to see is that it is possible act ethically within an unethical system (there are exampels everywhere!) and that if we care about ethics we must make sure that our judgement is ethical too.

END

7/

For a bit of context, a return flight from Scotland to Spain uses roughly the same amount of energy as hundreds of thousands of substantial text only AI interactions. That’s a lifetime’s worth of pretty heavy AI use. Something, somewhere in our thinking has gotten skewed. This is not to advocate for, or excuse excessive AI use, it's to ask that judgement is proportional and accurate.

THREAD

1/

I’ve gotten quite a few messages from disabled people who benefit from AI in the same way I do but feel unable to admit to it because they are scared of backlash.

I will start by saying I understand concerns about AI, they are real. AI is energy intensive, data centres use water, a resource that is already scarce in many places, and the companies behind these products are unethical in so many ways.

#AI #Ethics #Scotland #Disability #UK #LLM

5/

Collapsing all AI use into one immoral category doesn’t make sense to me. Frivolously chatting to it all day, repeatedly generating images for fun, or asking it to write your book is not the same as asking AI to help navigate the labour and bureaucracy of disability, or the pressures of other forms of inequality.