I have a particular interest in Noah Goodall's debunking of Tesla's Autopilot safety claims because I wrote a post roughly outlining the same critique for The Daily Beast when Tesla started making these claims back in 2016.
You can read that here: https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-tesla-and-elon-musk-exaggeraged-safety-claims-about-autopilot-and-cars
For years, Tesla and its supporters have waved away detailed investigations tying Autopilot's design to multiple deaths, claiming that the safety benefits outweighed them.
Now, finally, we have published academic work proving that Autopilot has no safety benefits, when you adjust the numbers for road type and driver age. In fact crashes appear to be 11% higher with Autopilot!
Huge thanks to Noah Goodall of the Virginia Transportation Research Council for this work!
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19439962.2023.2178566?journalCode=utss20
A good, nuanced read on the EV battery mineral problem here, from Canary Media.
People need to get this through their heads: scaling manufacturing and scaling resource extraction are NOT the same. The scale of mining and processing expansion needed are mind-boggling, and these are not tidy, rationalized activities (especially mining/exploration).
@adamjcook I think that's a really reasonable approach.
Lately, I've been telling people about how my dad let me drive at age 12 on camping trips in Eastern Oregon, taking over when we would get to towns. There's no question I could drive, I just couldn't get a license, insurance, a job driving, etc. That's all part of the driving value chain, and what needs to be solved for.
@niedermeyer I have argued that instead of terms like "solving" or "achieving" (which is the typical nomenclature that Tesla employs for #FSDBeta) for Level 4-capable fleets that the true metric is a "Passenger Revenue-Minus-Continuous Validation Economic Model" - which closely resembles commercial air travel.
Continuous validation is extremely costly and continuous validation never ends (hence, why a concept of a "finish line" in safety-critical systems does not exist).