Mike Stevens

86 Followers
216 Following
110 Posts
🇦🇺 Publishing Director for whichcar.com.au | Dad, designer, journalist, photographer, gadgethead, cyclist. Lefty. Proud of my ADHD. 💪
Workhttp://whichcar.com.au/
Foliohttp://mikestevens.read.cv/
kids have been quietly doing their own thing for 20 minutes or so

Me, in my head, absolutely not out loud: right, think I'll head to the loo.

Kids: Papa!! Can you help me pls!!
Wait, is this considered a selling point? 😂

RE:
https://mastodon.online/users/9to5google/statuses/110357736039982280
9to5Google.com (@[email protected])

Attached: 1 image Pixel phones to gain new ringtone inspired by Kenny G https://9to5google.com/2023/05/12/pixel-ringtone-kenny-g/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=mastodon

Mastodon
If you want to clean up your timeline and hide boosts in CalcKey, go into Settings>General>Custom CSS and add this:

.notes > .renote { display: none; }

Save and reload.
@Basmitharts now this is awesome news.

A while ago, I read about the psycholgical effect that kicks in when someone tries to fight for a good cause, but then makes a tiny mistake.

We are very hard on hypocrisy because our brains like when things add up.

I.e. a climate activist with a plastic cup triggers much harder than Elon taking a 5 minute flight in his private jet every other day.

The first feels wrong, while the second just meets our expectations.

I can't stop seeng this everywhere ever since.

The Pixel Fold looks like it's the right size — a tablet that folds into a regular-size phone, not a TV remote like the Galaxy Fold — and if that's true I'm gonna buy one so hard https://www.theverge.com/2023/5/4/23711353/google-pixel-fold-announced
Google announces the Pixel Fold

Google has announced the Pixel Fold with some preview images and promises of more details coming at Google I/O on May 10th.

The Verge
Audio link: Not my usual type of post, but worth sharing — and it's a great pod too, so look it up. My point: It's pretty frightening to hear @[email protected] equate text prompt-driven AI creations as effectively equivalent to the well-established tradition of artists learning from other artists, whether historic greats or innovative contemporaries. As co-host @caseynewton notes, artists who learn from others are still putting in the thousands of hours (years of work) to learn the craft itself, either before or in conjunction with taking inspiration from other artists.

More than that, they're integrating and evolving and often building on those inspirations and learnings, which is how art develops.

Do some creators take it too far? Absolutely, and their years spent developing the
technical skill doesn't make it okay to apply no talent or creativity of their own. But in the vast, vast majority of cases, artists know where the line is and they take inspiration respectfully — and usually with credit to the artist who inspired them.

Being a 'prompt engineer', apart from being a massive ego-driven wank of a self-appointed title, is not the same thing. Are well-devised AI creations interesting? Absolutely. But when the software has learned from millions of pieces of established art with neither permission nor credit, and the 'engineer' entering the prompts is specifying 'in the style of Artist X', we've got multiple layers of grift. It is irrelevant that the finished piece might simply look inspired by Artist X if no effort is made to honour the original artist. In cases where it's a more directly and immediately identifiable copy of a style, to the point where audiences and buyers could easily confuse it as the real artist's work, that strikes me as a crime in concept if not yet in law.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/Cr7Jl7sp9Tv/

#HardFork is a great pod, though!
Mike Stevens on Instagram: "Not my usual type of post, but worth sharing — and it's a great pod too, so look it up. My point: It's pretty frightening to hear @kevinroose equate text prompt-driven AI creations as effectively equivalent to the well-established tradition of artists learning from other artists, whether historic greats or innovative contemporaries. As co-host @crumbler notes, artists who learn from others are still putting in the thousands of hours (years of work) to learn the craft itself, either before or in conjunction with taking inspiration from other artists. More than that, they're integrating and evolving and often building on those inspirations and learnings, which is how art develops. Do some creators take it too far? Absolutely, and their years spent developing the *technical skill* doesn't make it okay to apply no talent or creativity of their own. But in the vast, vast majority of cases, artists know where the line is and they take inspiration respectfully — and usually with credit to the artist who inspired them. Being a 'prompt engineer', apart from being a massive ego-driven wank of a self-appointed title, is not the same thing. Are well-devised AI creations interesting? Absolutely. But when the software has learned from millions of pieces of established art with neither permission nor credit, and the 'engineer' entering the prompts is specifying 'in the style of Artist X', we've got multiple layers of grift. It is irrelevant that the finished piece might simply look inspired by Artist X if no effort is made to honour the original artist. In cases where it's a more directly and immediately identifiable copy of a style, to the point where audiences and buyers could easily confuse it as the real artist's work, that strikes me as a crime in concept if not yet in law."

1 likes, 0 comments - Mike Stevens (@yomikestevens) on Instagram: "Not my usual type of post, but worth sharing — and it's a great pod too, so look it up. My poin..."

Instagram
@wrysanity yep, you're up next!
@TabbyKerr nah, it's built on their own AT Protocol, which they say will also be open just like AP, but we'll see.