| Github | http://www.github.com/michaelruigrok |
| key | null |
| pronouns | they/them |
| Personal Website | https://content.rodeo |
Michael Ruigrok
@michaelruigrok
- 2 Followers
- 99 Following
- 232 Posts
The proud owner of some entropy.
SleepyCattenTo make an omelette, you gotta break a few legs. Otherwise, you just get scrambled eggs instead.
cass 
Massa 👽 HumbertoNot even a one-liner: the weekly challenge today is "Write a script to return the running sum of the given array. Input: @int = (1, 2, 3, 4, 5); Output: (1, 3, 6, 10, 15)"
There is a metaoperator in #RakuLang for that (YAY #BatteriesIncluded):
It's the `[\]` metaoperator, that applies to another operator and returns the running reduction to another operation. So, the answer to the challenge is ```sub runinng-sum(@_) { [\+] @_ }```
more examples (and one with * instead of)...
neil breen’s fetlife accountA great infographic by scientific American illustrating the variety of intersex traits people can have:
JP“Criminals have unregulated access to the technology, and they exploit it to cause harm to the community. It follows that law enforcement would need to adopt the same AI technology"
…because we also want to cause harm to the community?
https://www.innovationaus.com/ai-privacy-fears-unsubstantiated-and-unwarranted-sa-police/
AI privacy fears 'unsubstantiated and unwarranted': SA Police
South Australia’s regulatory response to AI must not become the victim of “unsubstantiated and unwarranted” privacy concerns that could hinder important public safety work, the state’s policing agency has warned. The South Australian Police Force (SAPOL) has also talked up the technology’s potential to protect civil liberties by avoiding “random, widespread stop and search” activities during mass gathering or special events. Fronting a hearing of the ongoing parliamentary inquiry into AI on Thursday, Assistant Commissioner John Venditto said the proliferation of AI meant there was an increasing need for SAPOL to deploy capabilities of its own.
Li Chen
PallasRiotThe American Anthropological Association issued a statement on why they chose not to have a proposed lecture coming up, and it kicks ass.
"The function of the “gender critical” scholarship advocated in this session, like the function of the “race science” of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, is to advance a “scientific” reason to question the humanity of already marginalized groups of people, in this case, those who exist outside a strict and narrow sex / gender binary."
No Place For Transphobia in Anthropology: Session pulled from Annual Meeting program - The American Anthropological Association
The AAA and CASCA boards reached a decision to remove the session “Let’s Talk about Sex Baby: Why biological sex remains a necessary analytic category in anthropology” from the AAA/CASCA […]
[GRLC] DOL-001