@johnmu thanks for the reply! It’s interesting, b/c my immediate reaction is “well I wish there were a link” but better than nothing. Yes, at least it helps brand awareness; which has benefits (driving brand search volume & helping w/ non brand CTR)
But then I thought about what Google is saying about “links are less important”. Is Google (in any way) trying to find & associate the unlinked mention to a brand to assess expertise & authority of the brand? (re:E-A-T) 🧐
@simoncox @MikeBlazer I definitely thought about a xml sitemap on account that Google recommends that for site migrations, same suggestion that you had Mike! I’m going to analyze the URLs crawled a bit more …. If they are crawling those redirecting URLs but the corresponding 200-code URLs aren’t indexed, then I’ll manually submit like Simon mentioned.
That said, part of me wonders if Google continues to crawl those redirecting URLs bc they are testing if the redirects are still legit.
@simoncox The non-folder URLs are 301 redirecting to their appropriate /folder/article/ URL. There was only a few days where /article/ was a 404.
I checked GSC and Google continues to crawl /article/ URL in addition to /folder/article/ URL.
Wonder if they aren’t sure about our 301s. My only other guess is if I should create a temporary XML sitemap with the /article/ URLs.. or if that is going to send more confusing signals
What would you do? over the summer, someone accidentally changed the URLs of my clients site by removing a folder (eg /folder/article/ became /article/ in a redirect).
A few days later it was corrected back to /folder/article/ …but when that happened, the URL ( /article/) 404’d. Some of which Google had indexed. So they implemented a 301 from /article/ to /folder/article/.
Unfortunately they haven’t been able to bounce back or recover from the loss. Any ideas?