please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
my code has started (and ended) romantic relationships, changed how people view the world around them, and brought people bits of otherwise unachievable joy
it is embarrassing to tell on yourself that you can't do the same, but it is downright ignorant to claim it cannot or shouldn't be done at all
When I write code I am turning a creative idea into a mechanical embodiment of that idea. I am not creating beauty. Every line of code I write is a copy of another line of code I've read somewhere before, lightly modified to meet my needs. My code is not intended to evoke emotion. It does not change people think about the world. The idea→code pipeline in my head is not obviously distinguishable from the prompt->code process in an LLM
They want to create rules for the use of AI at my university. For me, this would be enough:
If you include something (a phrase, image, etc.) in your text and do not cite the source (which can never be an LLM, as these “generate” their content from other sources and are not always able to say what they used to generate the content), you are plagiarizing. The existing rules for plagiarism apply.
Used Theremin
Like new. Never been touched
This is an old blog post of mine, but I still really appreciate this subtle feature of Rust: one of the ways it supports robust thread-safe concurrent code is by _not making everything thread-safe._ It's odd that this property is so rare in languages. Just like how clear boundaries are critical in relationships, being able to designate which parts of your program _can't_ be shared across threads is critical for ensuring that the shared parts are correct.