GobiBahu

@kaapiuncle
2 Followers
12 Following
14 Posts
@KavitaKrishnan Every Hindu must be ashamed of such men walking freely and going abroad to make a country
But Moodevi, not all RW men are Sanghis, not all adhere to this man's reputation. So mind and mince ur words carefully. JNU is a Kailasa without the gold. Infact if u look carefully, there is not much difference between u and him. Both are vile beings
@imMAK02 it is incredible that scums like u are roaming free in society and aren't deported back to Syria.
Better encounter nahi hua
@KavitaKrishnan appo neenga otthukaringala...ungalukku illenu....🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Moonji oda serthu manasum asingama irukku unngaloda
@KavitaKrishnan obscenity? How is this funny jolly go pic obscene? Moolai la maattu shaani irundha ippadi daan
@Dasbolshevik just the boomerang effect of a BITCH called KARMA, i guess
@isaifpatel ...that's why the Lady of Justice has a blindfold. She has no ducking business for minoritism politics. Justice needs evidence...submitted in ample. Constitutional process shouldn't be viewed with lenses of personal biases.
@h_tejas we hv again reached my first tweet. The court didn't give the judgement based solely on Ram Charitmanas or Valmiki Ramayana. These were ofcourse used to boost the arguments for faith, but judgement was given based on artifacts, articles, physical evidence and documented proofs from past; for both the Mosque and Temple. So how do u accuse the court of acting like a Brahman sabha. U r hence questioning credibility of our institution and refracting OWAISI'S statement post verdict. Is it?
@TheTweetOfGod Then try to support urself by nailing your wrists and ankles on a cross, barely giving you any support for your back or neck. Shoulders and waist tied with ropes only to keep u from sliding. And hey hey hey...you also have to come back all white and shiny and float above the public delivering long discourses, 3 days after your apparent death.
@h_tejas oh is there a need to use WORDS EXCLUSIVELY and SPECIFICALLY NOW? Buddy the intention with which you wrote the original toot, clearly mocks the BRAHMINICAL ways ( that too of the past and which aren't followed now ). Comparing our Apex court to a "Brahmin Sadan" of mediaeval ages is mockery.
Now from ur track record i know, i can't convince u, bt u cannot keep feeding off and holding the present gen or the coming ones responsible for the deeds of a gen and their actions of the past.
@h_tejas chalo let's agree that Ramayan is a clever spinoff around real locations and timings, but even then my question remains same. How is the judgement, which u think isn't just enough, BRAHMINICAL? Is Raam, a fictional character, exclusive to Brahmins only? I again ask u, did the court exclusively consider the "Brahmin" proofs only? Do the numerous proofs submitted BRAHMINICAL in nature. How is anything that u don't accept and dislike becomes BRAHMINICAL in nature and u still live-off of it