There's something about the recent young turks comments that aren't sitting right with me. Ana Kasparian made the point that the civil rights movement was some peaceful movement. The idea MLK said he had a dream then boom everyone went to the ballot box, and racism was over. Ana and the people desperately trying to defend her (for money or clout) are trying to claim our issue is mainly of a peaceful vs violent debate, and not a narrative that's spread to enforce control. She said the civil rights movement never did action in which would stop the speech of others, that they never had tactics other than honest, civil, and liberal debate. Thanks to american pragmatism, the day was saved.
Yet instead of focusing on the ahistorical view of the civil rights moment. Instead of focusing on a narrative that's been placed to try and control minority groups. Instead of focusing on the narrative that's been built thanks to racism. We're here debating peace vs violence, and for calling Ana out, we have been depicted as the violent mob who is cancelling an honest liberal. Instead of us all acknowledging what Ana said was just downright wrong, we have people defending it on the grounds that they represent peace and justice.
This doesn't sit right with me.