@host Why was grup.pe blocked? @[email protected] has been markedly useful and without abuse.
| BGG | https://boardgamegeek.com/user/clearclaw |
| Blog | https://kanga.nu/~claw/blog/ |
| Keybase | https://keybase.io/clearclaw |
| BGG | https://boardgamegeek.com/user/clearclaw |
| Blog | https://kanga.nu/~claw/blog/ |
| Keybase | https://keybase.io/clearclaw |
@host Why was grup.pe blocked? @[email protected] has been markedly useful and without abuse.
@tabletopgamesblog There are three ways 1860 can end, and yes, the bank breaking is one of them. In descending frequency, they are: nationalisation, topping the stock market, and bank breaking.
And at least here, or with nearby players, 1860 is prone to blow-out wins, most especially with 3 players due to the float-2-companies-in SR2 strategy (very strong, not dominant, but also hard to fight).
3-player 1832. Tried something.
Bought the London Investment, Coal and Georgia Central presidency for $400, leaving me $300 cash -- just enough to float the GC using the London Investment.
SR2 sell a GC to buy into GM&O and L&N. OR2 the GC withholds (so the London Investment would keep paying $6 difference to me). SR3 tapped the GC again -- which setup 5 ORs of the GC with a CMV well below IPO and paying out with 40% paying to treasury.
Ended up with two systems: ACL+GC and SAL+N&W with, collectively, 6/6/10/12 and the ACL+GC at a $400 stock price.