Jan Eckhoff 💉⁷ 🐘

@janeckhoff@chaos.social
334 Followers
395 Following
2.8K Posts
Unzufriedener Sokrates & zufriedener Narr. Mäandert. Will weniger als 10% Idiot sein. Er/he/him. #NotJustSadTogether
About meSocrates dissatisfied & fool satisfied. Ever meandering. Strives to be less than 10% of an idiot. He/him. #NotJustSadTogether
This took me a second, but then, I’m a tad on the slow side.

"we recently paid people a few dollars to unfollow the most divisive accounts on X. After a month, they felt 23% less animosity towards other political groups.

"Their experience was so positive that half declined to refollow those hostile accounts after the study and they felt less animosity 11 months later.

"Platforms could easily redesign their algorithms to stop promoting the most outrageous voices and prioritize more representative or nuanced content."
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/jayvanbavel_are-a-few-people-ruining-the-internet-for-activity-7350191355928748032-4hMJ

Only a small percentative of people engage in toxic activity online, but they’re responsible for a disproportionate share of hostile or misleading content on nearly every platform. | Jay Van Bavel, PhD

Only a small percentative of people engage in toxic activity online, but they’re responsible for a disproportionate share of hostile or misleading content on nearly every platform. Because super-users are so active, they dominate our collective impression of the internet. Much of that distortion can be traced back to a few hyperactive online voices -Just 10% of users produce roughly 97% of political tweets. -A mere 0.1% of users share 80% of fake news. This leads many of us to believe that society is more polarized, angry, & deluded than it really is. The problem isn’t just the individual extremists, of course – it’s the platform design and algorithms that amplify their content. These algorithms are built to maximize engagement, which means they privilege content that is surprising or divisive. The system is optimized to promote the users who are most likely to distort our shared perception of reality. Most of us aren’t spending time on our phones trolling our foes. We’re busy working, raising families, spending time with friends, or simply trying to find some harmless entertainment on the internet. Yet, our voices are drowned out. We have effectively handed over a megaphone to the most obnoxious people and let them tell us what to believe and how to act. In a series of experiments, we recently paid people a few dollars to unfollow the most divisive accounts on X. After a month, they felt 23% less animosity towards other political groups. Their experience was so positive that half declined to refollow those hostile accounts after the study and they felt less animosity 11 months later. Platforms could easily redesign their algorithms to stop promoting the most outrageous voices and prioritize more representative or nuanced content. The internet is a powerful, and often valuable tool. But if we keep letting it reflect only the funhouse mirror world created by the most extreme users, we’ll all suffer the consequences. You can read my full essay in the The Guardian here: https://lnkd.in/eSvPymKc | 14 comments on LinkedIn

Love this graphic
When a network lays off one of America’s greatest satirists, it’s not because he failed. It’s because he succeeded too loudly.

@FotoVorschlag #FotoVorschlag "Demonstrationen und Kundgebungen"

8. Februar 2025, nachdem die #cducsu mit der #afd zusammen abstimmte

#münchenistbunt #munchengegenrechts #München #merz

mobil.org hat mal wieder ne Tempolimitumfrage (wer die nicht kennt, bitte erst mal hier lesen: https://lobbypedia.de/wiki/Mobil_in_Deutschland)

Wie zu erwarten ein bisserl Petrolhead-lastig. Da läßt sich vielleicht was tun.

https://www.mobil.org/umfrage-zum-tempolimit-2025/

Mobil in Deutschland

Merz ist 100% des Problems.

#Klimakatastrophe #LügenKanzler #CO2

Fascinating poster from the American Holocaust Museum. Thank goodness we aren't exhibiting any of these right now.
Bester Sticker! #vvoidcamp2025

Eine Sprachnachricht geht nur für den Sender schneller.
Das Abhören einer Sprachnachricht dauert etwa sechsmal länger als das Lesen der gleichen Information.
Wer immer nur Sprachnachrichten schickt, sagt Dir damit also: "Meine Zeit ist wichtiger als Deine!"

Credits: Tino Bomelino