@firefoxnightly -- I see the Anchor-positioning is coming along. Can you guys give me a time-line of when you think it's a good idea for me to start using it (simple cases) in my websites?
JK
@jamienk
- 21 Followers
- 258 Following
- 198 Posts
The list is long: webdev, Free Software, Ψanalysis, free expression, philosophy, quantum physics, Bob Dylan...
@simon
This is not just a curiosity: this is how language works, and also gestures toward the built-in limitations of LLMs. "Woke"/newspeak - trying to control language so it only means what we insist it should! Cf. "parapraxis."
This is not just a curiosity: this is how language works, and also gestures toward the built-in limitations of LLMs. "Woke"/newspeak - trying to control language so it only means what we insist it should! Cf. "parapraxis."
@dbattistella Just today I was sitting there minding my own business and some message by Noam Chomsky popped up -- I never read the guy before but from the lines that were quoted it was clear that he had no idea what he was talking about. The Left is dead.
@owa I hear you. From my POV, I think getting FF onto iPhone is more important, because then the features could be driven by what people want, rather than for what is in the interests of Apple or Google.
@owa Firefox?
@tiziodcaio Personally I hate the WP style, constantly opening and closing the php code and using the weird if: endif structures.
Set up variables (and pieces of html in loops) and then move on to HTML with sparse php
@chriskirknielsen @eric
But I'm also not sure abt the idea. What if (soon) we make our own LLMs. We want them to "read" everything we care about.
The problem isn't that LLMs scrape your data, it's that the LLM companies are bad. They should be regulated: Maybe pay more taxes, be banned from overusing electricity, be forced to make their code freely available, banned from making monopolistic partnerships, etc.
We WANT to feed text movies etc into our systems.
@chriskirknielsen @eric
I don't think this sort of thing would work? When an LLM scrapes your site, it is just gathering text and metadata to "train" on - to figure out all the weights that would make it generate sensible and otherwise "good" output. It is not taking your text as a prompt.
I don't think this sort of thing would work? When an LLM scrapes your site, it is just gathering text and metadata to "train" on - to figure out all the weights that would make it generate sensible and otherwise "good" output. It is not taking your text as a prompt.
But I'm also not sure abt the idea. What if (soon) we make our own LLMs. We want them to "read" everything we care about.
The problem isn't that LLMs scrape your data, it's that the LLM companies are bad. They should be regulated: Maybe pay more taxes, be banned from overusing electricity, be forced to make their code freely available, banned from making monopolistic partnerships, etc.
We WANT to feed text movies etc into our systems.
I don't think this sort of thing would work? When an LLM scrapes your site, it is just gathering text and metadata to "train" on - to figure out all the weights that would make it generate sensible and otherwise "good" output. It is not taking your text as a prompt.