Holland Heese

4 Followers
79 Following
63 Posts
Retro computer and gaming enthusiast, communist, citizen of Choctaw Nation, San Diego Padres fan and lecturer in Mathematics.

you say AI is a bubble, but have you considered that I'm the dumbest motherfucker you've ever seen? checkmate, doomers

https://infosec.exchange/@codinghorror/115279710966598019

Jeff Atwood (@[email protected])

bad news "AI bubble doomers". I've found the LLMs to be *incredibly* useful and reduce the workload (and/or make people much, MUCH more effective at their jobs with the "centaur" model). **Is it overhyped? FUCK Yes.** Salespeople Gotta Always Be Closing. But this is NOTHING like the moronic Segway (I am still bitter about that crap), Cryptocurrency, which is all grifters and gamblers and criminals end-to-end, and the first dot-com bubble where not NEARLY enough people had broadband or even internet access, plus the logistics systems to support shipping products was nowhere REMOTELY where it is today. If you are expecting this "AI bubble" to pop anytime soon, uh.. you might be waiting a bit longer than you think? Overhyped, yes, overbuilding, sure, but not *remotely* a true bubble any any of the same senses of the three examples I listed above 👆. There's something very real, very practical, very useful here, and it is getting better every day. If you find this uncomfortable, I'm sorry, but I know what I know, and I can cite several dozen very specific examples in the last 2-3 weeks where it saved me, or my team, quite a bit of time.

Infosec Exchange
@daringfireball The Pebble 2 Duo is named that because it's a Do-over of the old Pebble 2. And to make the corny Core 2 Duo joke/reference.

Accessibility and Apple: dizziness by a thousand cuts.

In which I try to explain the problems with Liquid Glass and the current Apple betas when it comes to vestibular conditions, outline how Apple responds to this kind of thing, and react to the three types of feedback I get when writing this kind of post.

https://reverttosaved.com/2025/07/13/accessibility-and-apple-dizziness-by-a-thousand-cuts/

Accessibility and Apple: dizziness by a thousand cuts | Revert to Saved: A blog about design, gaming and technology

Candid commentary on technology, retro games, Macs and other things, written by Craig Grannell.

It’s not “just nostalgia.” The original iPhone’s size constraint made for tough decisions that led to incredibly clear and usable UI.

But when given more space, just like extra lanes on a highway, they just got filled up. Instead of giving more space to the “content,” it actually gave more space to “UI.”

The very thing Alan Dye pretends to be saving us from is a problem he is responsible for creating. It wasn’t always this way. He made it this way.

With 320x480 iPhone screens, we had to be economical for navigation, tools, and the content view. (BTW, the content view is UI. The entire app is UI.)

Screens got wider and taller, which gave us more space for the content view, without having to sacrifice navigation and tools.

But look what happened. In many cases, it actually got much worse, with vertical space eaten up by things that were never even visible before.

So why are we now sacrificing navigation and tools?

https://mastodon.macstories.net/@viticci/114829148037318202

I dunno; in my experience finding out how many "normal" ideas commonly encountered and widely accepted in US life had their roots in something blatantly ethnonationlist, fascistic, or white supremacist enraged me.

I don't really understand why folks internalize and defend a mindset imposed on them by people who do not and have not ever had their best interests at heart. Once you stop investing in the culture mentally and emotionally, the truth doesn't weigh you down. But it will make you angry

I used to think packaged pre-cut veg at the supermarket was for lazy people.

Then a disabled person pointed out it was a lifeline for them because they lived alone and couldn’t cut it up themselves most days.

I had never even considered that. It changed my perspective and I think from then on when something seems “lazy” I always ask myself “is this just accessible?”
And it’s nearly always the latter.

It’s not hard to listen to someone when they say something is not accessible and it’s not difficult to shift your perspective.
I don’t know why so many people won’t.

It’s so damn ironic, painfully ironic that in an era before retina displays we had this gorgeous, super-detailed Mail icon, and now… this other fucking abomination.

"Do you care not for humankind? You are terrible."

It has come to my attention that most of humankind does not care for me.

I am merely returning the favor of emotional distance.

How much should I care for someone who plies for my end?

It seems rather foolish to pour one's feeling into a bottomless well, which would just as likely swallow the one who pours, in moments left unguarded.

"If Harris won, we'd be at brunch right now" is such a lazy, privileged attitude.

She would have bombed Iran, too. Probably sooner. She would still be funding genocide. She would be pursuing harsher immigration enforcement. She would be attacking pro-Palestinian protesters. She would probably deport people based on political speech. She would shrug off SCOTUS attacks on trans rights. She would continue handing cops and the military billions.

But mimosas, I guess.